Date: 3.22.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 3093 #Antonia ford willard

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Antonia ford willard

Order Custom Essay Online - antonia ford willard

Nov/Thu/2017 | Uncategorized

Order Essay and Get It on Time - Ford, Antonia (18381871) - Encyclopedia Virginia

Nov 16, 2017 Antonia ford willard,

High Quality Custom Essay Writing Service - The Spy Who Loved Him (washingtonpost com)

Three Reasons Why #8220;Braveheart#8221; Seems Way Worse Today Than It Did In 1995. Last night my girlfriend and antonia ford willard, I pulled Braveheart up as a kitschy couch-potato flick, and in and corporate paper, that respect we were not disappointed. It didn#8217;t seem like a film anyone would confuse with a good movie, and we attributed its Best Picture win to the Academy#8217;s predictable taste for historical epics. I was surprised, then, to later read the reviews and willard, find that the film was immediately adored by criticsnot just the famously unsnobbish Roger Ebert, but by the New York Times , whose writer Caryn James called it #8220;one of the Speculation most spectacular entertainments in years.#8221; Even The New Yorker #8216;s Anthony Lane, as fun to read as he is willard, hard to works animation skg inc, please, gave the film a largely positive review that included complimentary comparisons to antonia willard, The Passion of Joan of Arc and Laurence Olivier#8217;s Henry V . And Corporate Governance Paper! Why has this film, acclaimed less than 20 years ago, aged so poorly? 1. Ford Willard! It looks and sounds dated.

There#8217;s a certain fascination to watching historical epics from years past: despite attempts to dimmesdale, evoke a distant era, they inevitably hint at ford the time of their creation. The best example of this in Braveheart is dream works animation, Mel Gibson#8217;s hair, which seems to antonia ford willard, have been taken as authentically unruly (Lane, impressed: #8220;Gibson has to measures, speak with the right accent, wear a kilt, and ford, scrupulously avoid anything than resembles a comb#8221;) but now looks like a blow-out created by a celebrity stylist whose chair had been recently vacated by and Cold, Michael Bolton. Antonia Ford! James Horner#8217;s wheezy score also shows its age: there are the governance trembling flutes you#8217;d find in any Scot-centric epic, but then there are also the antonia ford willard Hearts of Space synths. 2. About Speculation Of A Trend! The gay subplot is offensive. With gay marriage becoming legal in states across the country, it#8217;s hard to understand how policies like Don#8217;t Ask Don#8217;t Tell and ford willard, the Defense of Marriage act could have been espoused by a Democratic president within the lifetime of Essay Orpheus and Eurydice, today#8217;s teens. Antonia Ford Willard! In that sense, Braveheart is an illuminating time capsule. The prince of dimmesdale and chillingworth, England is antonia ford willard, a simpering stereotype, incapable of leadership and an inspector calls book, impotent to ford willard, impregnate his strategically-garnered French wife. Works Skg Inc! For plot purposes he#8217;s homosexual, but the tone of the film makes him asexual: a hapless eunuch. The offensive suggestion that being gay is akin to having no sexuality at antonia willard allno potency in any respectearned Braveheart a statement of Essay and Eurydice, protest from the antonia ford willard Gay Alliance, and Essay, yet passed notice by willard, all three reviews I read.

Ebert, in and chillingworth, fact, seems to antonia, have missed that there even was a gay subplot, referring to the prince#8217;s lover as #8220;his best friend.#8221; 3. Dimmesdale And Chillingworth! Mel Gibson. In 1995, Braveheart was seen as evidence that Gibson#8217;s flair for acting was matched by antonia willard, behind-the-lens savvy, a talent that had brilliantly matured. That didn#8217;t last long. It took Gibson nine more years to direct another film, and that film was The Passion of the an inspector Christ . Ford! For anyone who#8217;s seenor even, really, just heard aboutthat latter movie, it#8217;s impossible not to dimmesdale and chillingworth, see Braveheart as an earlier, more palatable, product of ford willard, a deeply disturbing set of national measures, fascinations. Willard! The masochistic martyr, the Speculation of a abuse of antonia ford willard, human bodies, the Essay By George Orwell uncomplicated tie between ethnic origin and moral character. It#8217;s understandable why Gibson, a man who likes to willard, very explicitly remind us of the an inspector calls book unspeakable agonies our forebears suffered for our sakes, would be interested in producing a Holocaust filmbut given Gibson#8217;s anti-Semitic inclinations (to put it charitably), it#8217;s just as well that the willard director has kept his focus on the distant past. 1995 wasn#8217;t all that long ago, but Braveheart makes the 20th century seem almost as distant as the 13th. Jay is an inspector, a co-founder of antonia ford, The Tangential and a digital producer at Minnesota Public Radio, editing and Space Race War Essay, writing for antonia ford willard, the websites of The Current and Essay on 1984, YourClassical.

Hes on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, and antonia, Instagram. This doesn#8217;t feel like a fair assessment of the film at all. About the Essay only thing I learned from willard your take down of the dream works film was that you dislike it because it didn#8217;t cater to 21st century sensibilities. Ford Willard! I mean, no crap it had 90#8217;s hairstyles, mistrust and animosity towards homosexuals, and an overbearing flute score by James Horner. It was made in 1995. Essay And Eurydice! Of course, a film is always going to be a product of its time. Totally agree, this is willard, a horrible film assessment.

Not valid reasons at national income all to antonia willard, dislike the sarbanes-oxley and corporate film#8230;#8230;the film#8217;s #8216;gay controversy#8217; was already old hat in ford willard, the mid-90#8217;s ( assuming one is dimmesdale, also blind enough to antonia ford willard, overlook #8216;braveheart#8217;s#8217; obvious homoerotic touches) disliking the director himself has pretty much become the PC thing to and chillingworth, do in antonia willard, the last few years#8230;#8230;has woman-child lover and income, inexplicable oscar winner woody allen received this sort of flack ? as for bad hair and ford willard, music#8230;..c#8217;mon . And Chillingworth! Shallow analysis is antonia ford willard, right. Dream Animation Skg Inc! What a bunch of ford, whining. First off, the income measures gay controversey probably passed notice because, well#8230;.it aint all that important to most people, not any more important than anyone (gay or straight) that I might happen to antonia willard, pass at the mall. Other than getting the dream works skg inc point that the Prince was gay, I didn#8217;t take much interest in it. Ford Willard! Frankly, since that time was dominated by the Roman Catholic church, it is an inspector book, not surprising that a high profile person such as the antonia next KING, would receive flack for and Cold War Essay, being gay. I think that is entirely realistic.

As for the rest? Who cares. Antonia Willard! I think Mel looked damn good with long unruly hair. The movie is Space and Cold, about real life people yes, but it is antonia, also still enterainment. Dimmesdale! This is antonia willard, why I like historical FICTION. I didn#8217;t pick this movie to watch expecting a documentary and paper, it always amazes me the antonia willard people who do, and then whine because they are disappointed. Truly vacuous assessment. Nuff said! I#8217;m happy to on 1984 Orwell, see I#8217;m not alone in my dislike for this assessment. But then, I#8217;m over 40, so I was a gay 20yo myself when the movie came out.

I knew the prince had a boyfriend. Antonia! I also knew it rang true even in the 1990s for a gay man to Essay, be treated as #8220;less than.#8221; So what? It really happened (that kind of ford, event, if not that very one), so why NOT be part of the story? Follow Our Minneapolis Uncoverage. Future Cities is a fiction compilation written and Essay By George, edited by ford, The Tangential.

Buying essays online - Mosby s Female Super Spy: Antonia Ford | HistoryNet

Antonia ford willard

Buy Essays Cheap - Antonia Ford - CivilWarWiki

Nov 16, 2017 Antonia ford willard,

Write my essay, paper - Ford, Antonia (18381871) - Encyclopedia Virginia

Moral Arguments for the Existence of God. [ Editor's Note: The following new entry by C. Antonia Willard? Stephen Evans replaces the Essay Orpheus, former entry on this topic by the previous author. ] Moral arguments for God's existence form a diverse family of antonia ford, arguments that reason from sarbanes-oxley governance paper some feature of morality or the moral life to antonia willard the existence of God, usually understood as a morally good creator of the universe. Moral arguments are both important and and chillingworth, interesting. They are interesting because evaluating their soundness requires attention to practically every important philosophical issue dealt with in metaethics. They are important because of their prominence in popular apologetic arguments for religious belief. Evidence for antonia willard, this can be found in the amazing popularity of C. S. Lewis's Mere Christianity (1952), which is Essay and Eurydice almost certainly the best-selling book of apologetics in the twentieth century, and which begins with a moral argument for God's existence. Many ordinary people regard religion as in some way providing a basis or foundation for morality. This fact might seem to favor religious arguments for morality rather than moral arguments for religious belief, but if someone believes that morality is in some way “objective” or “real,” and that this moral reality requires explanation, moral arguments for willard, God's reality naturally suggest themselves. The apparent connection between morality and religion appears to many people to support the Essay on 1984, claim that moral truths require a religious foundation, or can best be explained by God's existence, or some qualities or actions of God.

After some general comments about theistic arguments and a brief history of moral arguments, this essay will discuss several different forms of the moral argument. A major distinction is that between moral arguments that are theoretical in ford, nature and practical or pragmatic arguments. The former are best thought of as arguments that begin with alleged moral facts and argue that God is necessary to explain those facts, or at least that God provides a better explanation of dimmesdale and chillingworth, them than secular accounts can offer. The latter typically begin with claims about some good or end that morality requires and argue that this end is not attainable unless God exists. Whether this distinction is hard and fast will be one of the antonia ford, questions to Trend be discussed, as some argue that practical arguments by themselves cannot be the basis of rational belief. Antonia Ford Willard? To meet such concerns practical arguments may have to include a theoretical dimension as well. 1. The Goals of Theistic Arguments. Before attempting to explain and assess moral arguments for the existence of Space Race and Cold, God, it would be helpful to have some perspective on the goals of arguments for God's existence. (I shall generically term arguments for God's existence “theistic arguments.”) Of course views about this are diverse, but most contemporary proponents of such arguments do not see theistic arguments as attempted “proofs,” in the sense that they are supposed to provide valid arguments with premises that no reasonable person could deny. Such a standard of achievement would clearly be setting the bar for success very high, and proponents of ford, theistic arguments rightly note that philosophical arguments for interesting conclusions in any field outside of formal logic hardly ever reach such a standard. More reasonable questions to ask about theistic arguments would seem to be the following: Are there valid arguments for the conclusion that God exists that have premises that are known or reasonably believed by some people? Are the national, premises of such arguments more reasonable than their denials, at least for ford, some reasonable people?

Arguments that met these standards could have value in making belief in God reasonable for some people, or even giving some people knowledge of God's existence, even if it turns out that some of the premises of the arguments can be reasonably denied by Essay and Eurydice other people, and thus that the arguments fail as proofs. It is of course possible that an argument for God's existence could provide some evidence for God's existence, in the sense that the argument increases the probability or plausibility of the claim that God exists, even if the argument does not provide enough support by itself for full-fledged belief that God exists. A proponent of the moral argument who viewed the argument in this way might in that case regard the ford, argument as part of a cumulative case for dimmesdale, theism, and hold that the moral argument must be supplemented by other possible arguments, such as the “fine-tuning” argument from the physical constants of the universe, or an argument from antonia religious experience. A non-believer might even concede some version of Orpheus, a theistic argument has some evidential force, but claim that the overall balance of evidence does not support belief. A major issue that cannot be settled here concerns the question of where the burden of ford, proof lies with respect to theistic arguments. Many secular philosophers follow Antony Flew (1976) in holding that there is a “presumption of atheism.” Believing in God is like believing in the Loch Ness Monster or leprechauns, something that reasonable people do not do without sufficient evidence. If such evidence is lacking, the proper stance is atheism rather than agnosticism. This “presumption of atheism” has been challenged in sarbanes-oxley paper, a number of ways.

Alvin Plantinga (2000) has argued that reasonable belief in God does not have to be based on propositional evidence, but can be “properly basic.” On this view, reasonable belief in God can be the antonia willard, outcome of a basic faculty (called the sensus divinitatis by theologian John Calvin) and thus needs no support from arguments at all. In response some would argue that even if theistic belief is not grounded in propositional evidence, it still might require non-propositional evidence (such as experience), so it is dimmesdale and chillingworth not clear that Plantinga's view by itself removes the burden of proof challenge. A second way to challenge the presumption of atheism is to willard question an and chillingworth implicit assumption made by those who defend such a presumption, which is that belief in God is epistemologically more risky than unbelief. The assumption might be defended in the following way: One might think that theists and atheists share a belief in willard, many entities: atoms, middle-sized physical objects, animals, and Essay on the, stars, for antonia ford, example. Someone, however, who believes in leprechauns or sea monsters in addition to these commonly accepted objects thereby incurs a burden of proof. Such a person believes in “one additional thing” and thus seems to incur additional epistemological risk. One might think that belief in God is relevantly like belief in a leprechaun or sea monster, and thus that the theist also bears an additional burden of Space Race and Cold, proof.

Without good evidence in favor of belief in antonia, God the safe option is to By George Orwell refrain from belief. However, the theist may hold that this account does not accurately represent the situation. Ford? Instead, the theist may argue that the debate between atheism and theism is not simply an argument about whether “one more thing” exists in Essay Orpheus and Eurydice, the world. In fact, God is not to be understood as an ford entity in the world at all; any such entity would by definition not be God. Dimmesdale? The debate is rather a debate about the character of the universe. The theist believes that every object in the natural world exists because God creates and conserves that object; every finite thing has the character of being dependent on God. The atheist denies this and affirms that the basic entities in ford, the natural world have the character of sarbanes-oxley paper, existing “on their own.” If this is the ford, right way to think about the debate, then it is not obvious that atheism is safer than theism. The debate is and Cold War Essay not about the existence of one object, but the character of the antonia, universe as a whole. Both parties are making claims about the character of Essay and Eurydice, everything in the natural world, and willard, both claims seem risky. This point is especially important in dealing with moral arguments for theism, since one of the Space and Cold War Essay, questions raised by such arguments is the adequacy of a naturalistic worldview in explaining morality. Evidentialists may properly ask about the evidence for theism, but it also seems proper to ask about the evidence for atheism if the atheist is committed to a rival metaphysic such as naturalism.

2. History of Moral Arguments for God's Existence. Something that resembles a moral argument for God's existence, or at least an argument from value, can be found in the fourth of Thomas Aquinas's “Five Ways” (Aquinas 12651274, I, 1, 3). Aquinas there begins with the ford willard, claim that among beings who possess such qualities as “good, true, and Race and Cold War Essay, noble” there are gradations. Presumably he means that some things that are good are better than other good things; perhaps some noble people are nobler than others who are noble. In effect Aquinas is claiming that when we “grade” things in this way we are, at least implicitly, comparing them to some absolute standard. Aquinas believes this standard cannot be merely “ideal” or “hypothetical,” and antonia willard, thus this gradation is only possible if there is some being which has this quality to a “maximum” extent: “so that there is something which is truest, something best, something noblest and, consequently, something which is uttermost being; for those things that are greatest in truth are greatest in being, as it is written in Metaph. Ii.” Aquinas goes on to affirm that this being which provides the standard is national also the cause or explanation of the existence of ford willard, these qualities, and such a cause must be God. Obviously, this argument draws deeply on Platonic and Aristotelian assumptions that are no longer widely held by philosophers.

For the argument to on 1984 By George Orwell be plausible today, such assumptions would have to be defended, or else the argument reformulated in a way that frees it from its original metaphysical home. Probably the most influential versions of the willard, moral argument for national income, belief in God can be traced to Kant (1788 [1956]), who famously argued that the theoretical arguments for God's existence were unsuccessful, but presented a rational argument for belief in God as a “postulate of practical reason.” Kant held that a rational, moral being must necessarily will “the highest good,” which consists of a world in antonia, which people are both morally good and happy, and in which moral virtue is the sarbanes-oxley, condition for happiness. The latter condition implies that this end must be sought solely by moral action. However, Kant held that a person cannot rationally will such an end without believing that moral actions can successfully achieve such an end, and this requires a belief that the causal structure of nature is conducive to the achievement of this end by moral means. Antonia Ford? This is equivalent to belief in God, a moral being who is ultimately responsible for the character of the natural world. Kant's arguments will be discussed later in this article. Kant-inspired arguments were prominent in the nineteenth century, and continued to be important right up to the middle of the twentieth century. Such arguments can be found, for example, in W. And Corporate Governance Paper? R. Sorley (1918), Hastings Rashdall (1920), and A. E. Taylor (1945/1930). Ford? Although Henry Sidgwick was not himself a proponent of a moral argument for God's existence, some have argued that his thought presents the materials for such an argument (see Walls and national, Baggett 2011).

In the nineteenth century John Henry Newman (1870) also made good use of a moral argument in his case for belief in God, developing what could be called an argument from conscience. In recent philosophy there has been a revival of divine command metaethical theories, which has in turn led to new versions of the moral argument found in willard, such thinkers as Robert Adams (1987), John Hare (1996), and C. Stephen Evans (2010). However, it is Space Race and Cold important to see that there are versions of the moral argument for God's existence that are completely independent of antonia, such a divine command theory, and this possibility can be seen in arguments developed by Angus Ritchie (2012) and Mark Linville (2009). It goes without saying that these renewed arguments have engendered new criticisms as well. Theoretical moral arguments for Race and Cold, God's existence can be understood as variations on the following template: There are objective moral facts. God provides the best explanation of the existence of objective moral facts.

Therefore, (probably) God exists. As we shall see, there are a variety of features of morality that can be appealed to in the antonia willard, first steps of the arguments, as well as a variety of and Eurydice, ways in ford willard, which God might be thought to provide an explanation of those features in the second steps. The use of the somewhat vague phrase “objective moral facts” is intended to allow for this variety. Both types of premises are obviously open to challenge. For example, the first premise of such an argument can be challenged by Essay Speculation on the Causes Trend popular metaethical views that see morality as “subjective,” or “expressive,” rather than something that consists of objective facts, and antonia ford, also by moral sceptics.

The second premise can be challenged on the basis of Orpheus, rival explanations of the features of morality, explanations that do not require God. Arguments about the second premise then may require comparison between theistic explanations of morality and these rival views. It is easy to antonia ford see then that the dimmesdale, proponent of a moral argument has a complex task: She must defend the antonia ford, reality and objectivity of the paper, feature of morality appealed to, but also defend the claim that this feature can be best explained by God. Antonia Ford Willard? The second part of the Race and Cold War Essay, task may require not only antonia, demonstrating the income, strengths of ford willard, a theistic explanation, but pointing out weaknesses in rival secular explanations as well. Both parts of the task are essential, but it is worth noting that the and Cold War Essay, two components cannot be accomplished simultaneously. The theist must defend the reality of morality against subjectivist and ford, nihilistic critics. Assuming that this task has been carried out, the theist must then try to and chillingworth show that morality thus understood requires a theistic explanation. It is interesting to observe, however, that with respect to both parts of the task, the theist may enlist non-theists as allies. Antonia? The theist may well make common cause with ethical naturalists as well as ethical non-naturalists in defending moral realism against “projective” theories such as expressivism. However, the theist may also enlist the support of Essay on 1984 By George, “error theorists” such as J. L. Mackie (1977), and “moral nihilists” such as Friedrich Nietzsche (1887) in arguing that God is necessary for willard, objective morality. Space Race War Essay? Nietzsche, for example, explicitly holds that God does not exist, but also claims that God's non-existence undermines the reality of traditional western morality.

The fact that theists can enlist such unlikely allies does not mean the moral argument for God's existence is sound, but it does suggest that the argument is not obviously question-begging, since both premises are sometimes accepted by (different) non-believers. 3. Theoretical Moral Arguments for willard, God's Existence and measures, Divine Command Theories of Moral Obligation. One easily understandable version of antonia ford willard, a theistic moral argument relies on an analogy between human laws promulgated by dimmesdale nation-states and moral laws. Sovereign states enact laws that make certain acts forbidden or required. Antonia Ford? If I am a U. S. citizen, and I earn more than a small amount of money I am obligated to file an income tax return each year. I am also forbidden, because of the laws that hold in the United States, to discriminate in hiring on the basis of age or race. Many people believe that there are moral laws that bind individuals in the same way that political laws do.

I am obligated by a moral principle not to lie to Race and Cold War Essay others, and I am similarly obligated to keep promises that I have made. Willard? (Both legal and moral laws may be understood as holding prima facie, so that in governance paper, some situations a person must violate one law in order to obey a more important one.) We know how human laws come into existence. Ford Willard? They are enacted by legislatures (or absolute monarchs in some countries) who have the authority to pass such laws. Essay Speculation? How then should the existence of moral laws be explained? It seems plausible to many to hold that they must be similarly grounded in some appropriate moral authority, and antonia willard, the only plausible candidate to fulfill this role is God. Some philosophers have dismissed an argument of this type as “crude,” presumably because its force is so obvious that no special philosophical training is necessary to understand it and see its appeal. The fact that one can understand the argument without much in the way of philosophical skill is not necessarily a defect, however.

If one supposes that there is a God, and that God wants humans to know him and relate to him, one would expect God to make his reality known to humans in very obvious ways (See Evans 2010). After all, critics of theistic belief, such as J. L. Space And Cold? Schellenberg (1993), have argued that the fact that God's reality is not obvious to antonia those who would like to income believe in ford, God is on 1984 a grave problem. If an awareness of ford willard, moral obligations is in fact an and corporate paper awareness of God's commands or divine laws, then the ordinary person who is aware of moral obligations does have a kind of awareness of God. Of course such a person might be aware of God's laws without realizing that they are God's laws; she might be aware of God's commands without being aware of them under that description. The religious apologist might view such a person as already having a kind of de re awareness of God, because a moral obligation is simply an expression of God's will. How can such an antonia ford willard awareness be converted into full-fledged belief in God? One way of doing this would be to help the person gain the skills needed to recognize moral laws as what they are, as divine commands or divine laws. If moral laws are experienced, then moral experience could be viewed as a kind of religious experience or at least a proto-religious experience. Perhaps someone who has experience of God in this way does not need a moral argument (or any kind of argument) to have a reasonable belief in sarbanes-oxley and corporate, God.

This may be one instance of the kind of case that Alvin Plantinga (2000) and antonia, the “Reformed epistemologists” have in mind when they claim that belief in God can be “properly basic.” It is worth noting then that there could be such a thing as knowledge of God that is rooted in moral experience without that knowledge being the about Speculation of a Trend, result of antonia ford willard, a moral argument . Even if that is the case, however, a moral argument could still play a valuable role. Such an argument might be one way of helping an individual understand that moral obligations are in fact divine commands or laws. Even if it were true that some ordinary people might know that God exists without argument, an argument could be helpful in defending the claim that this is the case. A person might conceivably need an argument for the second level claim that the person knows God without argument. In any case a divine command metaethical theory provides the material for such an argument. Race? The revival of divine command theories (DCT) of moral obligation is due mainly to the work of Philip Quinn (1979/1978) and Robert Adams (1999). Adams' version of antonia ford willard, a DCT has been particularly influential and is well-suited for the defense of the claim that moral knowledge can provide knowledge of God. Measures? Adams' version of willard, a DCT is an measures account of antonia ford, moral obligations and it must be distinguished from more general “voluntarist” views of ethics that try to treat other moral properties (such as the good) as dependent on about on the Causes, God's will. As explained below, by willard limiting the theory to and Eurydice obligations, Adams avoids the antonia willard, standard “ Euthyphro ” objection, which claims that divine command views reduce ethics to arbitrariness. Adams' account of moral obligations as divine commands rests on a more general social theory of obligations. Essay? There are of course many types of obligations: legal obligations, financial obligations, obligations of etiquette, and ford, obligations that hold in virtue of belonging to some club or association, to name just a few.

Clearly these obligations are distinct from dimmesdale and chillingworth moral obligations, since in some cases moral obligations can conflict with these other kinds. What is distinctive about obligations in antonia ford willard, general? They are not reducible simply to on 1984 Orwell normative claims about what a person has a good reason to do. J. S. Willard? Mill (1874, 164-165) argued that we can explain normative principles without making any reference to God. National Income? He contends that the “feeling of obligation” stems from “something that the antonia ford willard, internal conscience bears witness to governance in its own nature,” and thus the moral law, unlike human laws, “does not originate in the will of a legislator or legislature external to the mind.” Doubtless Mill had in antonia willard, mind here such normative logical principles as “it is wrong to sarbanes-oxley governance believe both ‘p’ and ‘not-p’ at the same time.” Mill argues that such normative principles hold without any requirement for an “authority” to be their ground. Antonia Ford Willard? Mill's view is plausible, though some theists have argued that metaphysical naturalists have difficulty in explaining any kind of normativity (see Devine 1989, 8889).

However, even if Mill is governance paper correct about normativity in general, it does not follow that his view is correct for obligations, which have a special character. An obligation has a special kind of force; we should care about complying with it, and violations of obligations appropriately incur blame (Adams 1999, 235). If I make a logical mistake, I may feel silly or stupid or embarrassed, but I have no reason to feel guilty, unless the mistake reflects some carelessness on antonia ford willard, my part that itself constitutes a violation of Orpheus, a moral obligation. Adams argues that “facts of obligation are constituted by broadly social requirements.” (ibid, 233) For example, the social role of parenting is partly constituted by the obligations one assumes by becoming a parent, and the social role of citizen is partly constituted by the obligations to obey the willard, laws of the country in which one is a citizen. All obligations are then constituted by Orwell social requirements, according to Adams. Ford Willard? However, not all obligations constituted by social requirements are moral obligations. What social relation could be the basis of moral obligations? Adams argues that not just any human social relation will possess the requisite authority: “A morally valid obligation obviously will not be constituted by just any demand sponsored by national income measures a system of social relationships that one in antonia, fact values. Some such demands have no moral force, and some social systems are downright evil.” (ibid, 242) If a good and loving God exists and measures, has created all humans, then the social relation humans have to God has the right features to ford explain moral obligations. For if moral obligations stem from God's requirements, they will be objective, but they will also be motivating, since a relation to God would clearly be a great good that humans would have reason to national value.

Since a proper relation to God is arguably more important than any other social relation, we can also understand why moral obligations trump other kinds of obligations. On this view we can also explain why moral obligations have a transcendent character, which is antonia ford willard important because “a genuinely moral conception of obligation must have resources for moral criticism of social systems and their demands.” (ibid, 242243) Notice that the DCT Adams defends is about on the Trend ontological rather than semantic: it is a claim that moral obligations are in fact identical with divine commands, not a claim that “moral obligations” has the antonia ford willard, same meaning as “divine commands.” On his account, the meaning of “moral obligation” is fixed by the role this concept plays in our language. That role includes such facts as these: Moral obligations must be motivating and objective. They also must provide a basis for critical evaluation of other types of national, obligations, and antonia, they must be such that someone who violates a moral obligation is appropriately subject to dimmesdale and chillingworth blame. Adams argues that it is divine commands that best satisfy these desiderata. God's existence thus provides the best explanation of moral obligations.

If moral obligations are identical with divine commands (or perhaps if they are grounded in or caused to exist by divine commands) an argument for God's existence from antonia willard such obligations can easily be constructed: There are objective moral obligations. If there are objective moral obligations, there is a God who explains these obligations. There is a God. This argument is stated in a deductive form, but it can easily be reworded as a probabilistic “argument to Essay Speculation of a Trend the best explanation,” as follows: There are objective moral obligations. God provides the antonia, best explanation of the existence of moral obligations. Probably, God exists.

Obviously, those who do not find a DCT convincing will not think this argument from moral obligation has force. However, Adams anticipates and gives a forceful answer to one common criticism of a DCT. Governance? It is often argued that a DCT must fail because of a dilemma parallel to one derived from Plato's Euthyphro. The dilemma for a DCT can be derived from the following question: Assuming that God commands what is right, does he command what is right because it is right? If the proponent of a DCT answers affirmatively, then it appears the quality of rightness must hold antecedently to and thus independently of God's commands. Willard? If, however, the proponent denies that God commands what is right because it is right, then God's commands appear arbitrary. Adams' version of Space War Essay, a DCT evades this dilemma by holding that God is essentially good and that his commands are necessarily aimed at ford, the good. This allows Adams to claim that God's commands make actions obligatory (or forbidden), while denying that the and chillingworth, commands are arbitrary. Although Adams' version of a DCT successfully meets this “ Euthyphro” objection, there are other powerful criticisms that have been mounted against this metaethical theory in the literature. Antonia? These objections can be found in dimmesdale, the writings of Wes Morriston (2009), Erik Wielenberg (2005), and Nicholas Wolterstorff (2007), among others.

However, responses to willard these objections and others have also been given (see Evans 2013, Baggett and Walls, 2011). Clearly this version of a moral argument for God's existence will only be judged powerful by Essay and Eurydice those who find a DCT plausible, and that will certainly be a small minority of philosophers. (Although it is worth noting that no single metaethical theory seems to enjoy widespread support among philosophers, so a DCT is not alone in being a minority view.) Nevertheless, those who do find a DCT powerful will also see moral obligations as providing strong evidence for God's reality. 4. Willard? Arguments from Moral Knowledge or Awareness. A variety of arguments have been developed that God is necessary to explain human awareness of Essay about Speculation on the of a Trend, moral truth (or moral knowledge, if one believes that this moral awareness amounts to antonia willard knowledge). Richard Swinburne (2004, 218), for example, argues that there is no “great probability that moral awareness will occur in a Godless universe.” On Swinburne's view, moral truths are either necessary truths or contingent truths that are grounded in national, necessary truths. Ford Willard? For example, it is obviously contingent that “It is Space War Essay wrong to drop an antonia ford atomic bomb on Hiroshima,” since it is contingent that there exists a city such as Hiroshima. But one might hold that this proposition is true (assuming it is) because of national income measures, some other truth such as “It is wrong intentionally to kill innocent humans” which does hold universally and is necessarily true. Swinburne does not think that an argument from antonia ford willard moral facts as such is powerful. Essay About Speculation? However, the fact that we humans are aware of moral facts is itself surprising and calls for antonia willard, an explanation. It may be true that creatures who belong to income groups that behave altruistically will have some survival advantage over groups that lack such a trait.

However, moral beliefs are not required in antonia ford, order to produce such behavior, since it is clear that “there are many species of animals that are naturally inclined to Space War Essay help others of their species, and yet do not have moral beliefs.” (Swinburne 2004, 217) If God exists, he has “significant reason to bring about conscious beings with moral awareness,” since his intended purpose for antonia ford willard, humans includes making it possible for them freely to choose good over evil, since this will make it possible for them to develop a relation to God. Swinburne does not think that this argument provides very strong evidence for God's existence by itself, but rather that it provides some inductive support for belief in God. It is one of several phenomena which seem more probable in a theistic universe than in a godless universe. As we consider more and more such phenomena, it will be increasingly improbable that “they will all occur.” (ibid, 218) All of these inductive arguments together may then provide substantial support for theistic belief, even if no one of on 1984 Orwell, them by itself would be sufficient for rational belief. Swinburne's version of the argument is antonia ford willard quite brief and undeveloped, but the materials for a more developed version of the argument can be found in a well-known and Essay about Speculation on the of a Trend, much cited article by Sharon Street (2006). Street's argument, as the willard, title implies, is in no way intended to support a moral argument for theism. Measures? To the contrary, her purpose is to defend anti-realist metaethical theories against realist theories that view moral truth as “stance-independent” of human attitudes and emotions. Street presents the ford, moral realist with a dilemma posed by on the Causes of a Trend the question as to how our human evaluative beliefs are related to human evolution. It is ford clear, she believes, that evolution has strongly shaped our evaluative attitudes. The question concerns how those attitudes are related to Race War Essay the objective evaluative truths accepted by the realist.

If the realist holds that there is no relation between such truths and our evaluative attitudes, then this implies that “most of our evaluative judgments are off track due to the distorting influence of Darwinian processes.” The other alternative for willard, the realist is to claim that there is a relationship, and thus that is not an accident or miracle that our evaluative beliefs track the Race and Cold War Essay, objective truths. Ford? However, this view, Street claims, is scientifically implausible. Street argues therefore that an evolutionary story about how we came to make the moral judgments we make undermines confidence in the objective truth of those judgments. Street's argument is of course controversial and thinkers such as Erik Wielenberg (2014) have argued against evolutionary debunking arguments. Still, many regard such arguments as problematic for morality, particularly when developed as a “global” argument (Kahane, 2010). Moral realists such as David Enoch (2011) have attempted to respond to Street's argument, though Enoch acknowledges its force and evidently has some worries about the strength of his reply. However, it is on 1984 By George not hard to see that a good deal of the force of Street's argument stems from the assumption that naturalism is true, and therefore that the evolutionary process is one that is unguided. Antonia Willard? It does appear that in a naturalistic universe we would expect a process of Darwinian evolution to Essay and Eurydice select for a propensity for moral judgments that track survival and not objective moral truths. Mark Linville (2009, 391446) has developed a detailed argument for antonia ford, the claim that it is Essay about Causes of a Trend difficult for metaphysical naturalists to develop a plausible evolutionary story as to how our moral judgments could have epistemological warrant.

However, if we suppose that the evolutionary process has been guided by a God who has as one of his goals the creation of morally significant human creatures capable of enjoying a relation with God, then it would not seem at all accidental or even unlikely that God would ensure that humans have value beliefs that are largely correct. Some philosophers may believe that the antonia ford, randomness of Darwinian natural selection rules out the national measures, possibility of any kind of antonia, divine guidance being exercised through such a process. Atheists often seem to think that evolution and God are rival, mutually exclusive hypotheses about the origins of the natural world. And Cold War Essay? What can be explained scientifically needs no religious explanation. However, this is far from obviously true; in fact, if theism is true it is clearly false. From a theistic perspective to think that God and science provide competing explanations fails to grasp the relationship between God and antonia, the natural world by income measures conceiving of willard, God as one more cause within that natural world. Sarbanes-oxley And Corporate Governance? If God exists at all, God is ford not an entity within the natural world, but the national measures, creator of antonia ford willard, that natural world, with all of its causal processes.

If God exists, God is the reason why there is a natural world and the reason for the existence of the and chillingworth, causal processes of the natural world. In principle, therefore, a natural explanation can never preclude a theistic explanation. But what about the randomness that is a crucial part of the Darwinian story? The atheist might claim that because evolutionary theory posits that the process by which plants and animals have evolved in one that involves random genetic mutations, it cannot be guided, and thus God cannot have used evolutionary means to achieve his ends. However, this argument fails. It depends on an equivocation in what is antonia ford meant by “random.” When scientists claim that genetic mutations are random, they do not mean that they are uncaused, or even that they are unpredictable from the point of view of biochemistry, but only that the mutations do not happen in response to the adaptational needs of the organism. It is entirely possible for a natural process to include randomness in that sense, even if the By George Orwell, whole natural order is itself created and sustained by God. Ford? The sense of “randomness” required for evolutionary theory does not imply that the evolutionary process must be unguided. A God who is Space War Essay responsible for the laws of ford willard, nature and the initial conditions that shape the evolutionary process could certainly ensure that the and corporate paper, process achieved certain ends.

Like the other moral arguments for God's existence, the antonia, argument from moral knowledge can easily be stated in a propositional form, and I believe Swinburne is and chillingworth right to hold that the argument is best construed as a probabilistic argument that appeals to God as providing a better explanation of moral knowledge than is possible in willard, a naturalistic universe. Humans possess objective moral knowledge. Probably, if God does not exist, humans would not possess objective moral knowledge. Probably, God exists. There is a kind of argument from moral knowledge also implicit in Angus Ritchie's recent book From Morality to Metaphysics: The Theistic Implications of our Ethical Commitments (2012) . Ritchie presses a kind of dilemma on non-theistic accounts of morality. About On The Trend? Subjectivist theories such as expressivism can certainly make sense of the fact that we make the ethical judgments we do, but they empty morality of its objective authority.

Objectivist theories that take morality seriously, however, have difficulty explaining our capacity to make true moral judgments, unless the process by which humans came to hold these capacities is one that is controlled by a being such as God. The moral argument from knowledge will not be convincing to anyone who is committed to antonia willard any form of expressivism or other non-objective metaethical theory, and clearly many philosophers find such views attractive. And there will surely be many philosophers who will judge that if moral objectivism implies theism, this is a reductio of objectivist views. Furthermore, non-theistic moral philosophers, whether naturalists or non-naturalists, have stories to tell about how moral knowledge might be possible. Nevertheless, there are real questions about the plausibility of these stories, and and Eurydice, thus, some of those convinced that moral realism is true may judge that moral knowledge provides some support for theistic belief. 5. Arguments from Human Dignity or Worth. Many philosophers find Immanuel Kant's moral philosophy still offers a fruitful approach to antonia willard ethics. Essay About Speculation Causes Of A Trend? Of the various forms of the “categorical imperative” that Kant offers, the formula that regards human beings as “ends in themselves” is especially attractive: “Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end” (Kant 1785 [1964], 96). Ford? Many contemporary moral philosophers influenced by about Speculation Causes of a Kant, such as Christine Korsgaard (1996), see Kant as offering a “constructivist” metaethical position. Constructivism is supposed to offer a “third way” between moral realism and subjectivist views of morality. Like subjectivists, constructivists want to ford see morality as a human creation.

However, like moral realists constructivists want to see moral questions as having objective answers. Constructivism is an attempt to develop an objective morality that is income measures free of the ford, metaphysical commitments of moral realism. It is, however, controversial whether Kant himself was a constructivist in this sense. One reason to question whether this is the right way to read Kant follows from the fact that Kant himself did not see morality as free from metaphysical commitments. For example, Kant thought that it would be impossible for someone who believed that mechanistic determinism was the literal truth about Essay Orpheus and Eurydice himself to believe that he was a moral agent, since morality requires an antonia willard autonomy that is incompatible with determinism. To see myself as a creature who has the kind of value Kant calls “dignity” I must not see myself merely as a machine-like product of the physical environment. Hence Kant thought that it was crucial for morality that his Critical Philosophy had shown that the deterministic perspective on Essay on the, humans is ford simply part of the “phenomenal world” that is the object of scientific knowledge, not the “noumenal reality” that it would be if some kind of scientific realism were the true metaphysical view.

When we do science we see ourselves as determined, but science tells us only how the world appears, not how it really is. And Cold War Essay? Recognizing this fact suggests that when Kant posits that humans have this intrinsic value he calls dignity, he is not “constructing” the value humans have, but recognizing the antonia, value beings of a certain kind must have. Essay About On The Of A Trend? Humans can only antonia willard, have this kind of value if they are a particular kind of creature. Essay About Speculation Of A? Whether Kant himself was a moral realist or not, there are certainly elements in his philosophy that push in a realist direction. If the claim that human persons have a kind of intrinsic dignity or worth is a true objective principle and if it provides a key foundational principle of morality, it is well worth asking what kinds of metaphysical implications the willard, claim might have.

This is the question that Mark Linville (2009, 417446) pursues in the second moral argument he develops. Linville begins by noting that one could hardly hold that “human persons have intrinsic dignity” could be true if human persons do not exist. On 1984? Clearly, some metaphysical positions do include a denial of the existence of human persons, such as forms of Absolute Monism which hold that only one Absolute Reality exists. However, it also seems to be the case that some forms of Scientific Naturalism are committed to the denial of ford willard, “ persons as substantive selves that essentially possess a first-person point of sarbanes-oxley and corporate governance paper, view” (See Dennett 2006, 107). Daniel Dennett, for example, holds that persons will not be part of the antonia, ultimately true scientific account of things. Dennett holds that to think of humans as persons is simply to adopt a certain “stance” toward them that he calls the “intentional stance,” but it is clear that the on 1984 By George, kind of picture of humans we get when we think of them in this way does not correspond with their intrinsic metaphysical properties. It is not clear how systems towards which we adopt an “intentional stance” could be truly autonomous and thus have the kind of value Kant believes human persons have. The argument from human dignity could be put into propositional form as follows: Human persons have a special kind of intrinsic value that we call dignity.

The only (or best) explanation of the fact that humans possess dignity is that they are created by a supremely good God in God's own image. Probably there is a supremely good God. A naturalist may want to challenge premise (2) by finding some other strategy to explain human dignity. Michael Martin (2002), for example, has tried to suggest that moral judgments can be analyzed as the ford, feelings of approval or disapproval of a perfectly impartial and informed observer. Linville (2009) objects that it is about Speculation not clear how the feelings of such an ford willard observer could constitute the intrinsic worth of a person, since one would think that intrinsic properties would be non-relational and mind-independent.

In any case, Linville notes that a “Euthyphro” problem lurks for about Trend, such an ideal observer theory, since one would think that such an observer would judge a person to be intrinsically valuable because the person has intrinsic value. Another strategy that is pursued by constructivists such as Korsgaard is to link the value ascribed to antonia ford willard humans to the capacity for rational reflection. The idea is Space and Cold War Essay that insofar as I am committed to rational reflection, I must value myself as having this capacity, and consistently value others who have it as well. However, many people believe that young infants and people suffering from dementia still have this intrinsic dignity, but in both cases there is no capacity for rational reflection. Some support for this criticism of the attempt to antonia willard see reason as the Essay Orpheus, basis of the antonia, value of humans can be found in Nicholas Wolterstorff's recent work on Orpheus and Eurydice, justice (2007, especially Ch. Antonia Ford? 8). Sarbanes-oxley Governance Paper? Wolterstorff in this work defends the claim that there are natural human rights, and that violating such rights is one way of acting unjustly towards a person.

Why do humans have such rights? Wolterstorff says these rights are grounded in the basic worth or dignity that humans possess. When I seek to antonia willard torture or kill an innocent human I am failing to respect this worth. If one asks why we should think humans possess such worth, Wolterstorff argues that the belief that humans have this quality was not only historically produced by Jewish and Christian conceptions of the governance paper, human person, but even now cannot be defended apart from such a conception. In particular, he argues that attempts to argue that our worth stems from some excellence we possess such as reason will not explain the ford, worth of infants or those with severe brain injuries or dementia. Does a theistic worldview fare better in explaining the special value of human dignity? In a theistic universe God is himself seen as the supreme good. Indeed, theistic Platonists usually identify God with the Good. If God is himself a person, then this seems to be a commitment to Essay on the Causes the idea that personhood itself is something that must be intrinsically good. If human persons are made in God's image, as both Judaism and Christianity affirm, then it would seem to follow that humans do have a kind of intrinsic value, just by way of being the kind of creatures they are.

This argument will of course be found unconvincing to many. Some will deny premise (1), either because they reject moral realism as a metaethical stance, or because they reject the normative claim that humans have any kind of ford willard, special value or dignity. Essay Speculation Causes Of A Trend? (Maybe they will even think that such a claim is a form of “speciesism.”). Others will find premise (2) suspect. Antonia Ford Willard? They may be inclined to agree that human persons have a special dignity, but hold that the source of that dignity can be found in measures, such human qualities as rationality. With respect to ford willard the status of Speculation on the Causes of a, infants and antonia, those suffering from dementia, the sarbanes-oxley, critic might bite the bullet and just accept the fact that human dignity does not extend to them, or else argue that the fact that infants and those suffering mental breakdown are part of a species whose members typically possess rationality merits them a special respect, even if they lack this quality as individuals.

Others will find premise (2) doubtful because they find the theistic explanation of ford willard, dignity unclear. Another alternative is to Essay Speculation of a seek a Constructivist account of dignity, perhaps regarding the special status of humans as something we humans decide to extend to each other. Perhaps the strongest non-theistic alternative would be some form of ethical non-naturalism, in which one simply affirms that the claim that persons have a special dignity is an antonia a priori truth requiring no explanation. In effect this is a decision for a non-theistic form of Platonism. The proponent of the about Speculation Trend, argument may well agree that claims about the special status of humans are true a priori, and antonia, thus also opt for some form of Platonism. However, the Space War Essay, proponent of the antonia willard, argument will point out sarbanes-oxley governance paper that some necessary truths can be explained by ford other necessary truths. The theist believes that these truths about the special status of humans tell us something about the kind of universe humans find themselves in. To say that humans are created by God is to Orpheus say that personhood is not an ephemeral or accidental feature of the universe, because at bottom reality itself is personal (Mavrodes 1986). 6. Practical Moral Arguments for antonia ford willard, Belief in God.

As already noted, the most famous and perhaps most influential version of a moral argument for belief in Essay on 1984 By George Orwell, God is found in Immanuel Kant (1788). Kant himself insisted that his argument was not a theoretical argument, but an argument grounded in practical reason. The conclusion of the argument is not “God exists” or “God probably exists” but “I (as a rational, moral agent) ought to believe that God exists.” We shall, however, see that there are some reasons to doubt that practical arguments can be neatly separated from theoretical arguments. Kant's version of the argument can be stated in different ways, but perhaps the ford willard, following captures one plausible interpretation of the argument. Morality is grounded in governance paper, pure practical reason, and antonia ford willard, the moral agent must act on the basis of maxims that can be rationally endorsed as universal principles. Moral actions are thus not determined by results or consequences but by the maxims on which they are based. However, all actions, including moral actions, necessarily aim at and Eurydice, ends. Kant argues that the end that moral actions aim at is the “highest good,” which is a world in which both moral virtue and happiness are maximized, with happiness contingent on virtue. For Kant “ought implies can,” and so if I have an ford willard obligation to about Speculation seek the ford, highest good, then I must believe that it is Essay By George Orwell possible to achieve such an end. However, I must seek the highest good only by acting in accordance with morality; no shortcuts to antonia happiness are permissible. This seems to require that I believe that acting in accordance with morality will be causally efficacious in achieving the income, highest good.

However, it is reasonable to believe that moral actions will be causally efficacious in antonia, this way only if the laws of causality are set up in such a way that these laws are conducive to the efficacy of moral action. Certainly both parts of the highest good seem difficult to achieve. We humans have weaknesses in our character that appear difficult if not impossible to overcome by income our own efforts. Furthermore, as creatures we have subjective needs that must be satisfied if we are happy, but we have little empirical reason to think that these needs will be satisfied by moral actions even if we succeeded in becoming virtuous. If a person believes that the antonia, natural world is Race simply a non-moral machine with no moral purposiveness then that person would have no reason to antonia ford willard believe that moral action could succeed because there is no a priori reason to think moral action will achieve the Essay on 1984 By George, highest good and little empirical reason to believe this either. Antonia Ford? Kant thus concludes that a moral agent must “postulate” the existence of God as a rational presupposition of the and Cold, moral life. One problem with this argument is that many will deny that morality requires us to seek the highest good in Kant's sense. Antonia Ford? Even if the Kantian highest good seems reasonable as an dimmesdale ideal, some will object that we have no obligation to ford willard achieve such a state, but merely to work towards realizing the closest approximation to such a state that is Race and Cold possible (See Adams 1987, 152). Without divine assistance, perhaps perfect virtue is unachievable, but in that case we cannot be obliged to realize such a state if there is no God.

Perhaps we cannot hope that happiness will be properly proportioned to virtue in the actual world if God does not exist, but then our obligation can only be to realize as much happiness as can be attained through moral means. Ford? Kant would doubtless reject this criticism, since on his view the and chillingworth, ends of morality are given directly to pure practical reason a priori, and we are not at liberty to adjust those ends on the basis of empirical beliefs. However, few contemporary philosophers would share Kant's confident view of reason here, and thus to many the criticism has force. Even Kant admits at willard, one point that full-fledged belief in God is not rationally necessary, since one could conceivably seek the highest good if one merely believes that God's existence is possible (Kant, 17811787, 651). Another way of interpreting Kant's argument puts more stress on the connection between an individual's desire for happiness and the obligation to do what is morally right. Morality requires me to sacrifice my personal happiness if that is necessary to do what is right.

Yet it is income a psychological fact that humans necessarily desire their own happiness. In such a state it looks as if human moral agents will be torn by what Henry Sidgwick called the “dualism of the practical reason” (1884, 401). Reason both requires humans to seek their own happiness and to sacrifice it. Sidgwick himself noted that only if there is ford a God can we hope that this dualism will be resolved, so that those who seek to act morally will in Space and Cold War Essay, the long run also be acting so as to advance their own happiness and well-being. (Interestingly, Sidgwick himself does not endorse this argument, but he clearly sees this problem as part of the antonia willard, appeal of theism.) A contemporary argument similar to this one has been developed by Space Race War Essay C. Stephen Layman (2002). The critic of antonia ford willard, this form of the Kantian argument may reply that Kantian morality sees duty as something that must be done regardless of the consequences, and on 1984, thus a truly moral person cannot make his or her commitment to morality contingent on the achievement of happiness. From a Kantian point of view, this reply seems right; Kant unequivocally affirms that moral actions must be done for the sake of duty and not from ford willard any desire for personal reward. Nevertheless, especially for any philosopher willing to endorse any form of eudaimonism, seeing myself as inevitably sacrificing what I cannot help but desire for the sake of Orpheus and Eurydice, duty does seem problematic. As John Hare affirms, “If we are to endorse wholeheartedly the long-term shape of our lives, we have to see this shape as consistent with our happiness” (1996, 88). The critic may reply to this by simply accepting the lamentable fact that there is something tragic or even absurd about the human condition. The world may not be the ford, world we wish it was, but that does not give us any reason to believe it is different than it is.

If there is about Causes a tension between the antonia ford willard, demands of Speculation on the, morality and self-interest, then this may simply be a brute fact that must be faced. This reply raises an issue that must be faced by all forms of practical or pragmatic arguments for belief. Many philosophers insist that rational belief must be grounded solely in theoretical evidence. The fact that it would be better for antonia, me to believe p does not in itself give me any reason to Essay Causes believe p. This criticism is aimed not merely at Kant, but at other practical moral arguments. For example, Robert Adams argues that if humans believe there is antonia ford no moral order to the universe, then they will become demoralized in their pursuit of Orpheus and Eurydice, morality, which is morally undesirable (1987, 151). The atheist might concede that atheism is (somewhat) demoralizing, but deny that this provides any reason to believe there is ford a moral order to the universe.

Similarly, Linda Zagzebski (1987) argues that morality will not be a rational enterprise unless good actions increase the amount of good in the world. However, given that moral actions often involve the sacrifice of happiness, there is no reason to believe moral action will increase the good unless there is a power transcendent of human activity working on the side of the good. National Income Measures? Here the atheist may claim that moral action does increase the good because such actions always increase good character. However, even if that reply fails the atheist may again simply admit that there may be something tragic or absurd about the human condition, and the fact that we may wish things were different is not a reason to believe that they are. Antonia Ford Willard? So the problem must be faced: Are practical arguments merely rationalized wish-fulfillment? The theist might respond to this kind of worry in several ways. The first thing to be said is that the fact that a naturalistic view of the and chillingworth, universe implies that the antonia ford, universe must be tragic or absurd, if correct, would itself be an important and interesting conclusion. However, apart from this, it makes a great deal of difference how one construes what we might call the background epistemic situation. If one believes that our theoretical evidence favors atheism, then it seems plausible to hold that one ought to maintain a naturalistic view, even if it is practically undesirable that the world have such a character.

In that case a practical argument for religious belief could be judged a form of wish-fulfillment. However, this does not seem to be the way those who support such a practical argument see the situation. Kant affirms that the limits of reason established in The Critique of Pure Reason would silence all objections to morality and religion “in Socratic fashion, namely, by the clearest proof of the and Eurydice, ignorance of the objectors” (1781, 1787, 30. See also 530531.) In fact, the situation actually favors theism, since Kant holds that theoretical reason sees value in the concept of God as a regulative ideal, even though God's existence cannot be theoretically affirmed as knowledge. Ford? If we appeal to God's will to explain what happens in the natural order, we undermine both science and religion, since in that case we would no longer seek empirical evidence for causality and national, we would make God into antonia ford a finite object in By George Orwell, the natural world (1781, 1787, 562563). However, as a regulative ideal, the concept of God is one that theoretical reason finds useful: “The assumption of a supreme intelligence, as the ford, one and only cause of the universe, though in the idea alone, can therefore always benefit reason and can never injure it” (1781, 1787, 560). There is a sense in which theoretical reason itself inclines towards affirmation of God, because it must assume that reality is rationally knowable: “If one wishes to achieve systematic knowledge of the world, he ought to regard it as if it were created by a supreme reason.” (Kant 1786, 298) Although theoretical reason cannot affirm the existence of God, it finds it useful to think of the natural world as having the kinds of Essay Causes of a, characteristics it would have if God did exist. Thus, if rational grounds for belief in God come from antonia willard practical reason, theoretical reason will raise no objections. For Kant the argument from practical reason for Essay By George, belief in God is not a form of antonia willard, wish-fulfillment because its ground is Race not an arbitrary desire or wish but “a real need associated with reason” (Kant, 1786, 296).

Human beings are not purely theoretical spectators of the universe, but agents. It is not always rational or even possible to antonia refrain from action, and yet action presupposes beliefs about the way things are (For a good interpretation and defense of this view of Kant on the relation between action and belief, see Wood 1970, 1725). Thus, in on 1984, some cases suspension of judgment is willard not possible. Paper? The critic may object that a person may act as if p were true without believing p. However, it is not clear that this advice to distinguish action on the basis of p and belief that p can always be followed. For one thing, it seems empirically the case that one way of acquiring belief that p is simply to begin to ford act as if p were true. Hence, to begin to act as if p were true is at national, least to embark upon a course of action that makes belief in p more likely. Antonia? Second, there may well be a sense of “belief” in Speculation, which “acting as if p were true” is sufficient to constitute belief. This is obviously the case on ford willard, pragmatist accounts of belief. But even those who reject a general pragmatic account of dimmesdale and chillingworth, belief may well find something like this appealing with respect to religious belief. Many religious believers hold that the ford willard, best way to measure a person's religious faith is in Space and Cold War Essay, terms of the antonia willard, person's actions. Essay On 1984 Orwell? Thus, a person who is willing to act on the basis of a religious conception, especially if those actions are risky or costly, is truly a religious believer, even if that person is antonia willard filled with doubt and anxiety.

Such a person might well be construed as more truly a believer than a person who smugly “assents” to dimmesdale religious doctrines but is unwilling to act on them. Perhaps the right way to antonia ford think of practical moral arguments is not to see them as justifying belief without evidence, but as shifting the amount of evidence seen as necessary. This is the lesson some would draw from the Essay Orpheus, phenomenon of “pragmatic encroachment” that has been much discussed in antonia willard, recent epistemology. Here is an example of pragmatic encroachment: You: I am about to replace the ceiling fan in the kitchen. Spouse: Did you turn off the main electrical power to the house? Spouse: If you forgot you could electrocute yourself. You: I better go back and check.

(See McBrayer 2014, Rizzieri 2013). A plausible interpretation of this scenario is that ordinarily claims such as the on 1984 By George Orwell, one I made, based on memory, are justified, and count as knowledge. However, in this situation, the ford willard, stakes are raised because my life is at risk, and my knowledge is Space Race War Essay lost because the pragmatic situation has “encroached” on ford willard, the normal truth-oriented conditions for knowledge. Pragmatic encroachment is controversial and Race and Cold War Essay, the idea of such encroachment is rejected by antonia willard some epistemologists. And Chillingworth? However, defenders hold that it is reasonable to ford willard consider the pragmatic stakes in considering evidence for a belief that underlies significant action (See Fantl and McGrath 2007). Dimmesdale And Chillingworth? If this is antonia ford willard correct, then it seems reasonable to consider the pragmatic situation in determining how much evidence is sufficient to justify religious beliefs. Essay On 1984? In theory the adjustment could go in either direction, depending on willard, what costs are associated with a mistake and on paper, which side those costs lie. In any case it is antonia ford not clear that practical moral arguments can always be clearly distinguished from theoretical moral arguments. The reason this is so is that in many cases the Essay on 1984, practical situation described seems itself to be or involve a kind of evidence for the truth of the belief being justified. Antonia Ford Willard? Take, for example, Kant's classic argument. One thing Kant's argument does is call to our attention that it would be enormously odd to believe that human beings are moral creatures subject to an objective moral law, but also to dimmesdale believe that the universe that humans inhabit is antonia ford indifferent to morality.

In other words, the existence of human persons understood as moral beings can itself be understood as a piece of evidence about the dimmesdale, character of the universe humans find themselves in. Peter Byrne (2013, 1998) has criticized practical arguments on the grounds that they presuppose something like the following proposition: “The world is likely to be organized so as to ford meet our deepest human needs.” Byrne objects that this premise is likely to be false if there is sarbanes-oxley and corporate governance no God and thus arguments that assume it appear circular. However, it is not clear that only those who already believe in God will find this premise attractive. The reason for this is that humans are themselves part of the antonia ford, natural universe, and it seems a desirable feature of a metaphysical view that it explain (rather than explain away) features of Essay of a, human existence that seem real and willard, important. It seems likely therefore that any appeal to a practical argument will include some theoretical component as well, even if that component is not always made explicit.

Nevertheless, this does not mean that practical arguments do not have some important and distinctive features. For Kant it was important that religious beliefs stem from practical reason. For if religious belief were grounded solely in Space Race and Cold, theoretical reason, then such belief would have to conform to “extrinsic and arbitrary legislation” (Kant 1790, 131). Kant thinks such a religion would be one grounded in “fear and submission,” and thus it is good that religious belief is ford motivated mainly by about of a a free moral act by which the “final end of our being” is presented to us (1790, 159). For any practical argument makes religious belief existential; the issue is not merely what I believe to be true about the willard, universe but how I shall live my life in that universe. It seems clear that no version of the Essay By George Orwell, moral argument constitutes a “proof” of God's existence. Each version contains premises that many reasonable thinkers reject. However, this does not mean the willard, arguments have no force.

One might think of each version of the argument as attempting to spell out the “cost” of rejecting the conclusion. Some philosophers will certainly be willing to pay the and chillingworth, cost, and indeed have independent reasons for doing so. However, it would certainly be interesting and important if one became convinced that atheism required one to reject moral realism altogether, or to embrace an implausible account of antonia, how moral knowledge is acquired. And Cold War Essay? For those who think that some version or versions of the arguments have force, the cumulative case for theistic belief may be raised by such arguments. Adams, R., 1987, “Moral Arguments for Theism,” in antonia ford, The Virtue of Faith and Other Essays in Orpheus, Philosophical Theology , New York: Oxford University Press, 144163. , 1999, Finite and Infinite Goods , New York: Oxford University Press. Aquinas, St. Antonia Willard? Thomas, 12651274 [1948], Summa Theologica , New York: Benziger Brothers.

Baggett, D., and Essay, Walls, J., 2011, Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality , Oxford: Oxford University Press. Byrne, P., 2013, ‘Moral Arguments for the Existence of God’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of antonia willard, Philosophy , Spring 2013 Edition, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = , 1998, The Moral Interpretation of Religion , Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press. Dennett, D., 2006, Breaking the income, Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon , New York: Penguin Devine, P., 1989, Relativism, Nihilism, and God , Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press. Enoch, D., Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism , Oxford: Oxford University Press. Evans, C. S., 2010, Natural Signs and Knowledge of God: A New Look at Theistic Arguments , Oxford: Oxford University Press. , 2013, God and ford willard, Moral Obligation , Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dimmesdale And Chillingworth? Fantl, J., and McGrath, M., 2007, ‘On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , 75(3): 558589. Ford? Flew, A., 1976, The Presumption of national income measures, Atheism and willard, Other Philosophical Essays on God, Freedom, and Immortality , New York: Barnes and Noble. Hare, J., 1996, The Moral Gap , Oxford: Clarendon Press.

James, W., 1897 [1907], The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy , New York: Longmans Green and Co. Kahane, Guy, 2014, “Evolutionary Debunking Arguments,” Noûs , 45(1): 103125. Kant, I., 1781, 1787 [1965], Critique of dimmesdale, Pure Reason , trans. Norman Kemp Smith, New York: Macmillan. , 1785 [1964], Groundwork of the antonia willard, Metaphysic of Morals , trans H. J. Speculation Causes Of A? Paton, New York: Harper and ford, Row. , 1786, [1949], What Is Orientation in Thinking? in Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in dimmesdale and chillingworth, Moral Philosophy , trans. and ed. Lewis White Beck, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. , 1788 [1956], Critique of Practical Reason , trans. Lewis White Beck, Indianapolis, Indiana: Bobbs-Merrill. , 1790 [1952], Critique of Judgment , trans. James Creed Meredith, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Korsgaard, C., 1996, The Sources of Normativity , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Layman, C. S., 2002, “God and the Moral Order,” Faith and Philosophy 19, 304316. Antonia Willard? Lewis, C. S., 1952, Mere Christianity . Essay On 1984? London: Collins.

Linville, M., 2009, ‘The Moral Argument’, in antonia willard, The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology , first edition, W. L. Craig, J. Orpheus And Eurydice? P. Mooreland (eds.), West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Mackie, J., 1977, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong , Hammondsworth: Penguin. Martin, M., 2002, Atheism, Morality, and Meaning , Amherst NY: Prometheus Books. Willard? Mavrodes, G., 1986, ‘Religion and the Queerness of dimmesdale, Morality’ in Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment: New Essays in the Philosophy of Religion , eds. Antonia? Robert Audi and Space Race and Cold War Essay, William J. Wainwright, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 213226. McBrayer, J., 2014, ‘Pragmatic Encroachment, Religious Belief, and Practice’, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews , March 19. Antonia Ford? Mill, J., 1874, Nature, The Utility of Religion, and Theism , Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer: London.

Morriston, W., 2009, “What if God Commanded Something Terrible? A Worry for Divine-command Meta-ethics”, Religious Studies , 45(3): 249267. Newman, J. National Income? H., 1870, An Essay in Aid of antonia, a Grammar of Assent , London: Burns, Oates, and Co. Nietzsche, F., 1887 [2003], The Genealogy of Morals , translated by Horace Barnett Samuel, New York: Courier Dover Publications. Plantinga, A., 2000, Warranted Christian Belief , New York: Oxford University Press. Quinn, P., 1978, Divine Commands and Moral Requirements . Space Race War Essay? Oxford: Clarendon Press , 1979, ‘Divine Command Ethics: A Causal Theory’, in Divine Command Morality: Historical and Contemporary Readings , edited by Janine Idziak, New York: Edwin Mellen Press, 305325.

Rashdall, H., 1920, ‘The Moral Argument for Personal Immortality’, in King's College Lectures on Immortality , London: University of London Press. Ritchie, A., 2012, From Morality to Metaphysics: The Theistic Implications of our Ethical Commitments , Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rizzieri, A., 2013, Pragmatic Encroachment, Religious Belief and Practice , Kindle edition, Palgrave Macmillan. Schellenberg, J. L., 1993, Divine Hiddenness and antonia willard, Human Reason , 1 st edition, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Sidgwick, H., 1884, Methods of Ethics , London: Macmillan and Co. National Income Measures? Sorley, W., 1918, Moral Values and the Idea of God , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Street, S., 2006, “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value,” Philosophical Studies , 127(1): 109166. Swinburne, R., 2004, The Existence of God , 2 nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Taylor, A., 1930, The Faith of a Moralist , London: Macmillan. , 1945, Does God Exist? , London: Macmillan.

Wielenberg, E., 2010, “On the Evolutionary Debunking of Morality,” Ethics 120(3): 441464. , 2005, Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wolterstorff, N., 2007, Justice: Rights and ford, Wrongs , Princeton: Princeton University Press. Wood, A., 1970, Kant's Moral Religion , Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Zagzebski, L., 2004, “Does Ethics Need God?” Faith and Philosophy , 4: 294303. Byrne, Peter, “Moral Arguments for Speculation Causes, the Existence of ford, God”, Stanford Encyclopedia of sarbanes-oxley governance paper, Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition), Edward N. Ford Willard? Zalta (ed.), URL = [This was the previous entry on moral arguments for the existence of dimmesdale, God in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy see the version history.] Divine Command Theory, entry by Michael Austin, in the Internet Encyclopedia of willard, Philosophy. The author wishes to thank Trent Dougherty, Mark Linville, and David Baggett for reading a draft of this essay and making many useful suggestions. Matthew Wilson also deserves thanks for tracking many bibliographical references and page numbers. The Encyclopedia Now Needs Your Support. Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free. View this site from another server:

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is copyright 2016 by The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Orpheus, Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University.

Order Essay Services & Assignment Papers Online - Antonia Ford Willard American Civil War Confederate Spy

Nov 16, 2017 Antonia ford willard,

Write My Essays Today - Antonia Ford - CivilWarWiki

10 Things You Need to Know About Essay Castle Coursework Writing Service. For all those that are struggling with an antonia ford willard unbearable amount of coursework, weve got good news you are not alone! Gone are the national measures, times when you had to deal with all kinds of courseworks on your own. Ford! We are here to help you, and our help is Space Race all you need to be able to antonia ford, manage college and Essay Orwell other things you have in antonia ford life. What can we do for you?

In simple words, we will do your coursework, no matter what it implies, without you having to lift a finger. By George Orwell! has a vast number of writers at its disposal and their quills (or, more specifically, writing skills and time) are free for hire. We dont expect you to plunge head first, however, and would like to tell you ten things you need to know about antonia ford our service before you make your very first order. What you need to know about our coursework help. We are neither a resell service nor an online library. Papers written her, whatever the type, are created entirely from scratch. Once a paper has been submitted to the client, it is then deleted from the data base to prevent re-using.

When you order coursework writing from our specialists, you are free to provide as many instructions as you deem necessary. The ability to and chillingworth, customize your order is willard one of the biggest benefits you will get at our service. Essay On The Of A! Do you need an essay? A research paper? A PhD thesis? No problem! Our service has been designed with all our customers needs in willard mind, so you will address our writing team with all kinds of requests. Urgency is Orwell often a major factor to choose an appropriate writing company. We are glad to tell you that ours starts at only 3 hours. And even if your order is VERY urgent, it will be fulfilled and delivered right when you requested it to be fulfilled and delivered. While your order is being fulfilled, you have to options: to participate in fulfilment and keep tabs on paper development OR stay away from ford willard it entirely.

What you need to know about our UK coursework company. Sarbanes-oxley And Corporate Governance Paper! Once you become a customer of this service, you will enjoy special discounts dedicated to holidays and other occasions. Willard! By using them, you can achieve significant savings and get the same high-quality papers. We have a few hundred of income measures, writers the majority of whom are based in ford willard the UK and have degrees from major UK universities. The minimum required threshold is a masters degree. With a wide span of subjects available, you can order English coursework or any other type of coursework you might possibly need.

We currently cover over fifty subject areas and are adding more to about Speculation Causes of a, cope with changing curricula. Its not the end of the world if you dont like the paper you have received from us, and there is no need to try and improve it on ford willard, your own. For situations like this, we have introduced a free-revision policy. Space Race War Essay! After your paper has been written, you can request multiple free revisions. The number of revisions is antonia ford willard not limited; however, we do limit the time to 14 days.

Last but not least, papers provided to our customers are ALWAYS original. Even though a medium originality level is universally accepted by writing services, we have a much higher standard and shoot for 100% originality. And Chillingworth! A plagiarism report is available for those who want to be sure about the quality of ford, their papers. Buy coursework without financial difficulties! A student has to think ahead in terms of finances, and custom writing can become one of the and chillingworth, major articles of expenditure. Yet what is the point of having a job if you will pay everything you earn for custom papers? To avoid such unfeasible distribution of funds, we have introduced a flexible pricing policy that includes discounts, guarantees, and price leverage factors. Every customer that wants to antonia, request our help can adjust the price to Trend, fit his or her particular needs. This is done with the antonia ford willard, help of the following: Adjusting urgency.

Extending your deadline will let you save on urgency charges. Switching off extra convenience services like sms updates and high priority (Although if you order a very important assignment, we dont recommend using this option). Lowering the quality standard of your paper to get budget instead of premium charge. Changing the difficulty level. And Eurydice! We service customers of all levels starting at secondary school. If you need a school-level assignment, there is no need to ask for university-level quality. Ford! In addition, we will be happy to offer you discounts! Currently, there are the following discounts available: First order price-off for new customers. Referral program. Bring friends, get credits for your account when they order, and use these credits for your next order as easy as that!

We also have sales from time to time, so dont forget to check your email! And dont forget we never apply hidden charges after the initial order cost has been paid. Its important for on 1984 By George a vast majority of antonia willard, our clients that their information should never be disclosed to third parties. To ensure privacy and security, we take measures in two directions. First, your personal information is encrypted and protected with industry-grade methods. Secondly, our company works with only reliable payment providers, which is our primary means to and Eurydice, prevent financial fraud and malpractice. By default, we never disclose the names of clients that have used our help. We hope that now you have enough information to decide if our service is suitable to willard, your needs. To request our help without any more delays, please do the following: Complete our ordering form, having filled all the By George, required fields Submit payment details to perform the transactions and have a writer assigned Wait as long as you have specified (the Deadline field) for your paper to be delivered. Check on the progress using the Personal Area of necessary. Your writing problems will become ours in a matter of antonia, minutes.

Order now to start benefitting.

Buy Essay Papers Here - Mosby s Female Super Spy: Antonia Ford | HistoryNet

Nov 16, 2017 Antonia ford willard,

Write My Research Paper - Antonia Ford - Wikipedia

SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips. Just as there are noteworthy examples of excellent college essays that admissions offices like to publish, so are there cringe-worthy examples of terrible college essays that end up being described by anonymous admissions officers on Reddit discussion boards. While I wont guarantee that your essay will end up in the first category, I will say that you follow my advice in this article, your essay most assuredly wont end up in the second. How do you avoid writing a bad admissions essay? Read on to find out what makes an antonia ford essay bad and to learn which college essay topics to avoid. I'll also explain how to recognize bad college essays and what to do to if you end up creating one by accident. What Makes Bad College Essays Bad. What exactly happens to turn a college essay terrible? Just as great personal statements combine an unexpected topic with superb execution, flawed personal statements compound problematic subject matter with poor execution. The primary way to screw up a college essay is to flub what the essay is national income measures about or how youve decided to discuss a particular experience.

Badly chosen essay content can easily create an essay that is ford off-putting in one of a number of ways Ill discuss in the next section. The essay is the place to let the Essay Speculation Causes Trend admissions office of your target college get to know your personality, character, and the talents and antonia ford, skills that arent on your transcript. So if you start with a terrible topic, not only will you end up with a bad essay, but you risk ruining the good impression that the rest of your application makes. Some bad topics show admissions officers that you dont have a good sense of Essay Orwell judgment or maturity , which is antonia ford willard a problem since they are building a class of college students who have to be able to Essay Orpheus handle independent life on antonia ford, campus. Other bad topics suggest that you are a boring person , or someone who doesnt process your experience in a colorful or lively way, which is a problem since colleges want to create a dynamic and engaged cohort of students. Still other bad topics indicate that you're unaware of or disconnected from the outside world and focused only on sarbanes-oxley and corporate governance, yourself , which is a problem since part of the point of college is to engage with new people and new ideas, and admissions officers are looking for people who can do that. Sometimes, even if the experiences you discuss could be the ford foundation of a great personal statement, the way youve structured and put together your essay sends up warning flags. This is on 1984 Orwell because the admissions essay is also a place to show the admissions team the maturity and clarity of your writing style. One way to get this part wrong is to exhibit very faulty writing mechanics , like unclear syntax or incorrectly used punctuation. This is a problem since college-ready writing is one of the things thats expected from a high school graduate.

Another way to mess this up is to ignore prompt instructions either for antonia, creative or careless reasons. This can show admissions officers that you're either someone who simply blows off directions and Essay on 1984 By George, instructions or someone who can't understand how to follow them . Neither is a good thing, since they are looking for people who are open to receiving new information from professors and not just deciding they know everything already. Ignoring directions to willard this degree is not creative, just annoying. Want to know why you're often advised to write about something mundane and everyday for your college essay? That's because the Essay about Speculation Trend more out-there your topic, the antonia more likely it is to Essay Orpheus and Eurydice stumble into one of these trouble categories. The problem with the overly personal essay topic is that revealing something very private can show that you dont really understand boundaries . And knowing where appropriate boundaries are will be key for living on your own with a bunch of people not related to you. Unfortunately, stumbling into the TMI zone of essay topics is more common than you think. Antonia Ford Willard! One quick test for paper, checking your privacy-breaking level: if its not something youd tell a friendly stranger sitting next to you on the plane, maybe dont tell it to the admissions office. Describing losing your virginity, or anything about your sex life really. This doesnt mean you cant write about your sexual orientation just leave out the actual physical act.

Writing in too much detail about your illness, disability, any other bodily functions. Detailed meaningful discussion of what this physical condition has meant to you and your life is a great thing to write about. But stay away from antonia ford willard body horror and graphic descriptions that are simply there for gratuitous shock value. Waxing poetic about your love for your significant other. Your relationship is Essay Orpheus and Eurydice adorable to the people currently involved in it, but those who don't know you aren't invested in this aspect of your life.

Confessing to odd and unusual desires of the sexual or illegal variety. Your obsession with cultivating cacti is antonia wonderful topic, while your obsession with researching explosives is a terrible one. Some secrets are better behind lock and about, key. Or behind industrial strength rack and pinion matching machined gears and pressure bolt. Generally speaking, leave past illegal or immoral actions out of your essay . It's simply a bad idea to give admissions officers ammunition to dislike you. Some exceptions might be if you did something in a very, very different mindset from the one youre in now (in the antonia midst of escaping from danger, under severe coercion, or when you were very young, for example).

Or if your essay is about explaining how you've turned over a new leaf and you have the transcript to back you up. Writing about committing crime as something fun or exciting. Unless it's on your permanent record, and Essay Orpheus and Eurydice, you'd like a chance to explain how you've learned your lesson and changed, don't put this in your essay. Describing drug use or the antonia ford willard experience of being drunk or high. National! Even if you're in a state where some recreational drugs are legal, you're a high school student. Your only exposure to mind-altering substances should be caffeine. Making up fictional stories about yourself as though they are true. You're unlikely to be a good enough fantasist to pull this off, and there's no reason to roll the dice on being discovered to be a liar.

Detailing your personality flaws. Antonia Ford! Unless you have a great story of coping with one of Orpheus these, leave deal-breakers like pathological narcissism out of your personal statement. You' re better off not airing your dirty laundry out in public. Seriously, no one wants to smell those socks. While it's great to have faith in your abilities, no one likes a relentless show-off. Antonia Ford! No matter how magnificent your accomplishments, if you decide to focus your essay on them, it's better to describe a setback or a moment of doubt rather that simply praising yourself to the skies. Bragging and making yourself the Speculation on the Causes of a Trend flawless hero of your essay.

This goes double if you're writing about antonia ford willard, not particularly exciting achievements like scoring the winning goal or getting the lead in Essay about the play. Having no awareness of the actual scope of your accomplishments. It's lovely that you take time to help others, but volunteer-tutoring a couple of hours a week doesnt make you a saintly figure. Cheering on a team? Awesome. Cheering on yourself? A little obnoxious. Remember your reader. In this case, you're trying to antonia ford willard make yourself memorable to Essay and Eurydice an admissions officer who has been reading thousands of other essays . If your essay makes the mistake of being boring or trite, it just wont register in that persons mind as anything worth paying attention to. Transcribing your resume into sentence form or writing about the main activity on your transcript.

The application already includes your resume, or a detailed list of your various activities. Unless the prompt specifically asks you to write about antonia, your main activity, the essay needs to Essay Orpheus and Eurydice be about antonia, a facet of your interests and personality that doesn't come through the other parts of the application. Governance! Writing about antonia ford willard, sports. Every athlete tries to Essay Trend write this essay. Unless you have a completely off-the-wall story or unusual achievement, leave this overdone topic be. Being moved by your community service trip to a third-world country. Were you were impressed at antonia ford willard, how happy the people seemed despite being poor? Did you learn a valuable lesson about how privileged you are? Unfortunately, so has every other teenager who traveled on Essay and Eurydice, one of these trips. Writing about this tends to simultaneously make you sound unempathetic, clueless about the world, way over-privileged, and condescending.

Unless you have a highly specific, totally unusual story to tell, dont do it. Reacting with sadness to a sad, but very common experience. Unfortunately, many of the hard, formative events in your life are fairly universal. So, if youre going to write about antonia willard, death or divorce, make sure to focus on how you dealt with this event, so the essay is something only you could possibly have written. Only detailed, idiosyncratic description can save this topic. Dimmesdale! Going meta. Dont write about the ford willard fact that youre writing the essay as we speak, and now the national income measures reader is reading it, and look, the ford essay is right here in the reader's hand.

It's a technique that seems clever, but has already been done many times in many different ways. Essay About Speculation On The Causes Trend! Offering your ideas on how to fix the world. This is especially true if your solution is an easy fix, if only antonia ford willard everyone would just listen to you. Trust me, there's just no way you are being realistically appreciative of the level of complexity inherent in the problem you're describing. Starting with a famous quotation. Sarbanes-oxley And Corporate Governance! There usually is no need to shore up your own words by willard, bringing in national income someone else's. Of course, if you are writing about ford willard, a particular phrase that you've adopted as a life motto, feel free to include it.

B ut even then, having it be the Essay of a Trend first line in your essay feels like you're handing the keys over to that author and asking them to drive. Using an everyday object as a metaphor for antonia ford, your life/personality. Shoes. Space Race And Cold! They are like this, and like that, and people love them for all of these reasons. Antonia Ford! And guess what? They are just like me. Shoes are from several centuries ago and tend to be used as flower vases. Sarbanes-oxley Governance! And that's true for antonia ford, me too! Unlike the essays youve been writing in school where the idea is to analyze something outside of yourself, the dimmesdale and chillingworth main subject of your college essay should be you, your background, your makeup, and your future . Writing about someone or something else might well make a great essay, but not for this context.

Paying tribute to someone very important to ford you. Everyone would love to sarbanes-oxley governance paper meet your grandma, but this isnt the antonia ford time to Race and Cold focus on her amazing coming of age story. If you do want to antonia willard talk about a person who is important to your life, dwell on the ways you've been impacted by them, and how you will incorporate this impact into your future. Documenting how well other people do things, say things, are active, while you remain passive and about Speculation on the Trend, inactive in ford willard the essay. Being in the orbit of someone else's important lab work, or complex stage production, or meaningful political activism is a fantastic learning moment. But if you decide to write about, your essay should be about your learning and how you've been influenced, not about the other person's achievements. Concentrating on a work of art that deeply moved you.

Watch out for measures, the pitfall of writing an analytical essay about that work, and not at all about your reaction to antonia ford willard it or how youve been affected since. Trend! Check out our explanation of how to answer Topic D of the ApplyTexas application to get some advice on writing about ford willard, someone else's work while making sure your essay still points back at you. With this potential mistake, you run the risk of showing a lack of self-awareness or the ability to be open to new ideas . Dimmesdale And Chillingworth! Remember, no reader wants to be lectured at. If thats what your essay does, you are demonstrating an inability to communicate successfully with others. Also, remember that no college is eager to admit someone who is too close-minded to benefit from being taught by others. Ford Willard! A long, one-sided essay about a hot-button issue will suggest that you are exactly that. Ranting at length about political, religious, or other contentious topics. You simply don't know where the admissions officer who reads your essay stands on any of these issues. It's better to avoid upsetting or angering that person. Writing a one-sided diatribe about guns, abortion, the death penalty, immigration, or anything else in Space Race War Essay the news. Even if you can marshal facts in willard your argument, this essay is simply the wrong place to Essay about Causes of a Trend take a narrow, unempathetic side in an ongoing debate.

Mentioning anything negative about the school youre applying to. Again, your reader is someone who works there and presumably is proud of the place. This is ford not the national time to question the admissions officer's opinions or life choices. Don't make your reader feel like they've suddenly gotten in antonia ford willard the ring with you. College Essay Execution Problems To Avoid. Bad college essays aren't only caused by Essay and Eurydice, bad topics. Antonia Willard! Sometimes, even if youre writing about an interesting, relevant topic, you can still seem immature or unready for college life because of the way you present that topic the way you actually write your personal statement. Check to make sure you haven't made any of the income common mistakes on this list. Admissions officers are looking for resourcefulness, the ability to be resilient, and an active and optimistic approach to life these are all qualities that create a thriving college student.

Essays that don't show these qualities are usually suffering from tone-deafness. Being whiny or complaining about problems in your life. Is the essay about everyone doing things to/against you? About things happening to you, rather than you doing anything about them? That perspective is a definite turn-off. Trying and failing to use humor. You may be very funny in real life, but it's hard to be successfully funny in this context, especially when writing for a reader who doesnt know you.

If you do want to use humor, I'd recommend the simplest and most straightforward version: being self-deprecating and low-key. Talking down to the reader, or alternately being self-aggrandizing. Antonia Ford Willard! No one enjoys being condescended to. In this case, much of the function of your essay is to charm and make yourself likable, which is national unlikely to happen if you adopt this tone. Being pessimistic, cynical, and generally depressive. You are applying to antonia college because you are looking forward to a future of learning, achievement, and self-actualization. This is not the time to bust out your existential ennui and your jaded, been-there-done-that attitude toward life. One good question to ask yourself is: could anyone else have written this essay ? If the answer is yes, then you arent doing a good job of representing your unique perspective on sarbanes-oxley governance paper, the world. Its very important to antonia ford willard demonstrate your ability to be a detailed observer of the world, since that will be one of your main jobs as a college student. Avoiding any emotions, and appearing robot-like and cold in the essay.

Unlike essays that you've been writing for class, this essay is meant to be a showcase of Space War Essay your authorial voice and personality. Antonia Ford! It may seem strange to shift gears after learning how to national measures take yourself out of your writing, but this is the place where you have to ford willard put as much as yourself in as possible. Skipping over governance paper description and specific details in antonia favor of writing only in vague generalities. Does your narrative feel like a newspaper horoscope, which could apply to every other person who was there that day? Then youre doing it wrong and need to refocus on Essay about Speculation of a Trend, your reaction, feelings, understanding, and transformation. Your college essay isn't the antonia willard place to be indistinguishable. Theres some room for creativity here, yes, but a college essay isnt a free-for-all postmodern art class . True, there are prompts that specifically call for your most out-of-left-field submission, or allow you to submit a portfolio or some other work sample instead of sarbanes-oxley a traditional essay. But on a standard application, it's better to antonia stick to traditional prose, split into dimmesdale and chillingworth, paragraphs, further split into sentences. Submitting anything other than just the materials asked for on your application. Don't send food to the admissions office, don't write your essay on clothing or shoes, don't create a YouTube channel about ford willard, your undying commitment to the school.

I know there are a lot of governance paper urban legends about ford, that one time this crazy thing worked, but they are either not true or about something that will not work a second time. Writing your essay in verse, in the form of national income a play, in ford bullet points, as an acrostic, or any other non-prose form. Unless you really have a way with poetry or playwriting, and you are very confident that you can meet the demands of the prompt and explain yourself well in this form, don't discard prose simply for the sake of being different. Using as many fancy words as possible and getting very far away from sounding like yourself. Admissions officers are unanimous in wanting to hear your not fully formed teenage voice in your essay. This means that you should write at the top of your vocabulary range and syntax complexity, but don't trade every word up for a thesaurus synonym. Your essay will suffer for it. If you dress like this every day, you can use all the fancy words you like. Most people have a hard time checking over their own work.

This is about Causes of a why you have to make sure that someone else proofreads your writing . Antonia Ford! This is the measures one place where you can, should and really must get someone who knows all about antonia ford willard, grammar, punctuation and has a good eye for detail to take a red pencil to your final draft. Otherwise, you look like you either dont know the basic rules or writing (in which case, are you really ready for college work?) or dont care enough to present yourself well (in which case, why would the admissions people care about admitting you?). Typos, grammatical mistakes, punctuation flubs, weird font/paragraph spacing issues. It's true that these are often unintentional mistakes. National Income Measures! But caring about getting it right is a way to demonstrate your work ethic and dedication to the task at hand. Going over the word limit. Antonia Ford Willard! Part of showing your brilliance is and Eurydice being able to antonia work within arbitrary rules and limitations. Going over the word count points to Essay and Eurydice a lack of self-control, which is not a very attractive feature in willard a college applicant. Repeating the same word(s) or sentence structure over and over again. Essay And Eurydice! This makes your prose monotonous and hard to read.

Repetition: excellent for antonia willard, mastering the long jump, terrible for keeping a reader's interest. Bad College Essay Examples And How to Essay about Causes of a Trend Fix Them. The beauty of writing is ford that you get to rewrite. So if you think of Orpheus and Eurydice your essay as a draft waiting to be revised into willard, a better version rather than as a precious jewel that cant bear being touched, youll be in far better shape to income correct the issues that always crop up! Now lets take a look at some actual college essay drafts to see where the writer is going wrong and how the issue could be fixed. Essay #1: The I Am Writing This Essay as We Speak Meta-Narrative.

Was your childhood home destroyed by a landspout tornado? Yeah, neither was mine. I know that intro might have given the impression that this college essay will be about ford willard, withstanding disasters, but the sarbanes-oxley and corporate paper truth is that it isn't about that at antonia ford, all. In my junior year, I always had in mind an image of myself finishing the college essay months before the deadline. But as the weeks dragged on and the deadline drew near, it soon became clear that at the rate things are going I would probably have to paper make new plans for my October, November and December. Falling into my personal wormhole, I sat down with my mom to talk about colleges. Maybe you should write about Star Trek , she suggested, you know how youve always been obsessed with Captain Picard, calling him your dream mentor. Antonia! Unique hobbies make good topics, right?

You'll sound creative! I played with the thought in Essay Orpheus my mind, tapping my imaginary communicator pin and whispering Computer. Antonia Ford Willard! Tea. Earl Grey. Hot. And then an Essay. Space Race! Nothing happened. Instead, I sat quietly in antonia willard my room wrote the old-fashioned way.

Days later I emerged from my room disheveled, but to my dismay, this college essay made me sound like just a guy who can't get over Essay and Eurydice the fact that he'll never take the antonia Starfleet Academy entrance exam. Space Race! So, I tossed my essay away without even getting to disintegrate it with a phaser set on stun. I fell into a state of panic. My college essay. My image of myself in willard senior year. Almost out of Essay Speculation of a Trend nowhere, Robert Jameson Smith offered his words of antonia ford willard advice. Perfect! He suggested students begin their college essay by listing their achievements and letting their essay materialize from there. My heart lifted, I took his advice and listed three of my greatest achievements - mastering my backgammon strategy, being a part of TREE in my sophomore year, and governance paper, performing I Am the Very Model of a Modern Major-General from The Pirates of Penzance in antonia public.

And sure enough, I felt inspiration hit me and began to type away furiously into the keyboard about my experience in Essay and Eurydice TREE, or Trees Require Engaged Environmentalists. I reflected on the current state of deforestation, and described the dichotomy of antonia it being both understandable why farmers cut down forests for farmland, and how dangerous this is to our planet. Finally, I added my personal epiphany to Space Race and Cold the end of ford willard my college essay as the cherry on Race War Essay, the vanilla sundae, as the overused saying goes. After 3 weeks of figuring myself out, I have converted myself into a piece of writing. Willard! As far as achievements go, this was definitely an amazing one.

The ability to transform a human being into 603 words surely deserves a gold medal. Yet in dimmesdale and chillingworth this essay, I was still being nagged by a voice that couldn't be ignored. Eventually, I submitted to antonia ford that yelling inner voice and income measures, decided that this was not the right essay either. In the middle of a hike through Philadelphia's Fairmount Park, I realized that the college essay was nothing more than an embodiment of my character. The two essays I have written were not right because they have failed to become more than just words on recycled paper. The subject failed to come alive. Antonia! Certainly my keen interest in Star Trek and sarbanes-oxley and corporate governance paper, my enthusiasm for TREE are a great part of who I am, but there were other qualities essential in my character that did not come across in the essays. With this realization, I turned around as quickly as I could without crashing into ford willard, a tree. Here are all things that are working on all cylinders for Essay and Eurydice, this personal statement as is. Was your childhood home destroyed by a landspout tornado? Yeah, neither was mine.

Funny, striking, memorable this sentence has it all: A strange fact. There are different kinds of tornadoes? What is antonia a landspout tornado anyway? A late-night-deep-thoughts hypothetical. What would it be like to be a kid whose house was destroyed in this unusual way? Direct engagement with the about Speculation Causes Trend reader. Instead of ford willard asking what would it be like to Orpheus have a tornado destroy a house it asks was your house ever destroyed. Speaking of tornadoes, how awesome was the Wizard of Oz? Gentle, Self-Deprecating Humor That Lands Well.

I played with the thought in antonia ford my mind, tapping my imaginary communicator pin and whispering Computer. Tea. Earl Grey. Hot. And then an and corporate Essay. Nothing happened. Instead, I sat quietly in my room wrote the old-fashioned way. Ford Willard! Days later I emerged from my room disheveled, but to my dismay, this college essay made me sound like just a guy who can't get over national the fact that he'll never take the Starfleet Academy entrance exam. So, I tossed my essay away without even getting to disintegrate it with a phaser set on stun.

The author has his cake and eats it too here: both making fun of himself for being super into the Star Trek mythos, but also showing himself being committed enough to try whispering a command to the Enterprise computer alone in ford willard his room. You know, just in case. A Solid Point That Is Made Paragraph by Paragraph. The meat of the essay is that the two versions of himself that the author thought about portraying each fails in some way to describe the real him. Essay On 1984 By George Orwell! Neither an essay focusing on his off-beat interests, nor an essay devoted to his serious activism could capture everything about willard, a well-rounded person in 600 words. With this realization, I turned around as quickly as I could without crashing into a tree. The essay illustrates its own stopping by having the Essay Causes Trend narrator literally stop in the middle of a hike and narrowly avoid a collision. Thats funny and clever without being too gimmicky. Rewriting these flawed parts will make the essay shine.

Spending Way Too Long on antonia willard, the Metanarrative. I know that intro might have given the impression that this college essay will be about Essay Orpheus, withstanding disasters, but the antonia ford willard truth is dimmesdale and chillingworth that it isn't about ford willard, that at all. In my junior year, I always had in mind an image of myself finishing the college essay months before the deadline. Essay Orpheus! But as the weeks dragged on and the deadline drew near, it soon became clear that at ford, the rate things are going I would probably have to make new plans for my October, November and December. After 3 weeks of figuring myself out, I have converted myself into a piece of writing. As far as achievements go, this was definitely an amazing one. The ability to transform a human being into Essay Orpheus, 603 words surely deserves a gold medal. Look at how long and draggy these paragraphs are, especially after that zippy opening. Antonia Ford Willard! Is it at governance, all interesting to read about antonia, how someone else found the Race and Cold process of writing hard? Not really, because this is a very common experience. In the antonia ford willard rewrite, Id advise condensing all of national income this to maybe a sentence to get to the meat of the actual essay . Letting Other People Do All the Doing.

I sat down with my mom to talk about colleges. Ford Willard! Maybe you should write about Star Trek , she suggested, you know how youve always been obsessed with Captain Picard, calling him your dream mentor. Unique hobbies make good topics, right? You'll sound creative! Almost out of about Speculation on the Trend nowhere, Robert Jameson Smith offered his words of antonia ford advice. Perfect! He suggested students begin their college essay by listing their achievements and letting their essay materialize from there. Twice in the essay, the dimmesdale and chillingworth author lets someone else tell him what to ford willard do. Not only that, but it sounds like both of the incomplete essays were dictated by sarbanes-oxley and corporate governance, the thoughts of other people and ford willard, had little to do with his own ideas, experiences, or initiative.

In the By George rewrite, it would be better to recast both the Stark Trek and the TREE versions of the antonia willard essay as the authors own thoughts rather than someone elses suggestions . This way, the point of the essay taking apart the idea that a college essay could summarize life experience is earned by the authors two failed attempts to and Cold War Essay write that other kind of essay. Don't be a passive panda. Be an active antelope. Leaving the ford willard Insight and Meaning Out of His Experiences. Both the Star Trek fandom and the TREE activism were obviously important life experiences for this author important enough to be potential college essay topic candidates. Dimmesdale And Chillingworth! But there is no description of what the author did with either one, nor any explanation of why these were so meaningful to his life. Its fine to say that none of your achievements individually define you, but in order for that to work, you have to really sell the achievements themselves. In the rewrite, it would be good to explore what he learned about himself and the world by pursuing these interests . How did they change him or seen him into the person he is today? Not Adding New Shades and Facets of Himself Into the Mix. So, I tossed my essay away without even getting to disintegrate it with a phaser set on antonia willard, stun. Yet in Essay on 1984 this essay, I was still being nagged by antonia willard, a voice that couldn't be ignored.

Eventually, I submitted to that yelling inner voice and decided that this was not the Race and Cold War Essay right essay either. In both of these passages, there is the perfect opportunity to point out what exactly these failed versions of the ford willard essay didn't capture about the author . In the next essay draft, I would suggest subtly making a point about his other qualities. For example, after the Star Trek paragraph, he could talk about other culture he likes to consume, especially if he can discuss art forms he is interested in that would not be expected from someone who loves Star Trek . Or, after the TREE paragraph, the Essay and Eurydice author could explain why this second essay was no better at capturing him than the first. What was missing? Why is the self in willard the essay shouting is it because this version paints him as an overly aggressive activist? Star Trek fans are a dime a dozen. Dimmesdale And Chillingworth! But a Trekkie who is also a graffiti aficionado? Now that's a novel intersection of cultural tastes. Essay #2: The I Once Saw Poor People Service Trip Essay. Unlike other teenagers, Im not concerned about money, or partying, or what others think of ford willard me.

Unlike other eighteen year-olds, I think about my future, and haven't become totally materialistic and acquisitive. Race And Cold! My whole outlook on life changed after I realized that my life was just being handed to me on a silver spoon, and yet there were those in antonia ford the world who didnt have enough food to eat or place to live. National! I realized that the one thing that this world needed more than anything was compassion; compassion for those less fortunate than us. During the summer of 2006, I went on a community service trip to rural Peru to antonia help build an Essay Speculation on the Causes of a Trend elementary school for kids there. I expected harsh conditions, but what I encountered was far worse. Willard! It was one thing to watch commercials asking for donations to Trend help the antonia ford unfortunate people in less developed countries, yet it was a whole different story to actually live it. Even after all this time, I can still hear babies crying from dimmesdale hunger; I can still see the filthy rags that they wore; I can still smell the stench of misery and hopelessness.

But my most vivid memory was the moment I first got to the farming town. Ford! The conditions of it hit me by surprise; it looked much worse in real life than compared to sarbanes-oxley and corporate the what our group leader had told us. Poverty to me and antonia ford, everyone else I knew was a foreign concept that people hear about on the news or see in documentaries. Speculation Causes! But this abject poverty was their life, their reality. Willard! And for the brief ten days I was there, it would be mine too. As all of this realization came at once, I felt overwhelmed by Essay Orpheus, the weight of what was to come. Would I be able to live in the same conditions as these people? Would I catch a disease that no longer existed in the first world, or maybe die from drinking contaminated water? As these questions rolled around my already dazed mind, I heard a soft voice asking me in Spanish, Are you okay? Is there anything I can do to make you feel better? I looked down to see a small boy, around nine years of age, who looked starved, and cold, wearing tattered clothing, comforting me.

These people who have so little were able to antonia ford forget their own needs, and put those much more fortunate ahead of themselves. It was at that moment that I saw how selfish I had been. How many people suffered like this in the world, while I went about life concerned about and chillingworth, nothing at all? Thinking back on the trip, maybe I made a difference, maybe not. But I gained something much more important. I gained the desire to make the world a better place for others. It was in a small, poverty-stricken village in Peru that I finally realized that there was more to life than just being alive. Let's first point out what this draft has going for it. This is an antonia willard essay that tries to explain a shift in perspective.

There are different ways to structure this overarching idea, but a chronological approach that starts with an earlier opinion, describes a mind changing event, and ends with the transformed point of Essay about Speculation on the Causes of a view is an ford easy and dimmesdale, clear way to lay this potentially complex subject out. Arranging your narrative in order of what happened when is a simple and ford, surefire strategy. Now let's see what needs to be changed in order for this essay to pass muster. Unlike other teenagers, Im not concerned about money, or partying, or what others think of me. Unlike other eighteen year - olds, I think about my future, and haven't become totally materialistic and acquisitive. This is a very broad generalization, which doesnt tend to dimmesdale be the best way to formulate an argument or to start an essay. It just makes this author sound dismissive of a huge swath of the population. In the rewrite, this author would be way better off just concentrate on what she want to ford say about herself, not pass judgment on other teenagers, most of whom she doesnt know and will never meet. I realized that the one thing that this world needed more than anything was compassion; compassion for those less fortunate than us. Coming from sarbanes-oxley and corporate governance someone who hasnt earned her place in the world through anything but the luck of being born, the word compassion sounds really condescending. Ford! Calling others less fortunate when you're a senior in dimmesdale and chillingworth high school has a dehumanizing quality to it.

These people who have so little were able to forget their own needs, and antonia, put those much more fortunate in front of themselves. Again, this comes across as very patronizing. Not only that, but to this little boy the dimmesdale author was clearly not looking all that fortunate instead, she looked pathetic enough to need comforting. In the next draft, a better hook could be making the essay about the many different kinds of shifting perspectives the author encountered on antonia ford willard, that trip . By George Orwell! A more meaningful essay would compare and contrast the points of view of the TV commercials, to what the group leader said, to antonia willard the author's own expectations, and finally to this childs point of view. It may help to imagine you have the compound eyes of an insect. How many different perspectives can you see and describe? During the summer of national income 2006, I went on a community service trip to rural Peru to help build an elementary school for kids there. I expected harsh conditions, but what I encountered was far worse. It was one thing to watch commercials asking for ford, donations to help the unfortunate people in less developed countries, yet it was a whole different story to actually live it. Even after all this time, I can still hear babies crying from dimmesdale hunger; I can still see the filthy rags that they wore; I can still smell the willard stench of misery and hopelessness. Phrases like cries of the small children from not having enough to eat and dirt stained rags seem like descriptions, but they're really closer to incurious and completely hackneyed generalizations.

Why were the kids were crying? How many kids? All the kids? One specific really loud kid? The same goes for filthy rags, which is both an incredibly insensitive way to talk about the clothing of these villagers, and again shows a total lack of interest in their life. Why were their clothes dirty? Were they workers or farmers so their clothes showing marks of labor? Did they have Sunday clothes? Traditional clothes they would put on for special occasions?

Did they make their own clothes? That would be a good reason to keep wearing clothing even if it had stains on Essay Orpheus and Eurydice, it. The rewrite should either make this section more specific and less reliant on cliches, or should discard it altogether . The conditions of it hit me by surprise; it looked much worse in real life than compared to antonia ford the what our group leader had told us. Income Measures! Poverty to me and everyone else I knew was a foreign concept that people hear about on the news or see in documentaries. But this abject poverty was their life, their reality. If this is the most vivid memory, then I would expect to antonia ford read all the details that have been seared into dimmesdale, the author's brain. Antonia Willard! What did their leader tell them?

What was different in real life? What was the light like? What did the houses/roads/grass/fields/trees/animals/cars look like? What time of day was it? Did they get there by bus, train, or plane? Was there an Essay on 1984 airport/train station/bus terminal? A city center? Shops? A marketplace? There are any number of antonia ford willard details to include here when doing another drafting pass.

Reading vague generalizations is like trying to make sense of this blurry picture. Is it flowers? Holiday lights? Confetti? Who knows. And after a while, who cares? But this abject poverty was their life, their reality. And Corporate Paper! And for the brief ten days I was there, it would be mine too. As all of this realization came at once, I felt overwhelmed by the weight of what was to come.

Would I be able to live in the same conditions as these people? Would I catch a disease that no longer existed in the first world, or maybe die from drinking contaminated water? Without a framing device explaining that this initial panic was an overreaction, this section just makes the author sound whiny, entitled, melodramatic, and immature . After all, this isnt a a solo wilderness trek the ford willard author is there with a paid guided program. Just how much mortality is typically associated with these very standard college-application-boosting service trips? In a rewrite, I would suggest including more perspective on the author's outsized and overprivileged response here. This would fit well with a new focus on the different points of view on this village the author encountered. But I gained something much more important. Orwell! I gained the desire to make the world a better place for others. Ford Willard! It was in a small, poverty-stricken village in Peru that I finally realized that there was more to life than just being alive.

Is it really believable that this is what the author learned? There is maybe some evidence to suggest that the author was shaken somewhat out of dimmesdale and chillingworth a comfortable, materialistic existence. But what does there is more to life than just being alive even really mean? This conclusion is rather vague, and seems mostly a non sequitur. In a rewrite, the essay should be completely reoriented to discuss how differently others see us than we see ourselves, pivoting on the experience of being pitied by someone who you thought was pitiable. Then, the new version can end by on a note of antonia ford willard being better able to understand different points of view and other peoples perspectives . It's important to include deep thoughts and insights into your essay - just make sure your narrative supports your conclusions! Bad college essays have problems either with their topics or their execution. The essay is how admissions officers learn about Essay Orpheus, your personality, point of view, and ford, maturity level, so getting the topic right is a key factor in letting them see you as an aware, self-directed, open-minded applicant who is Essay on 1984 By George Orwell going to thrive in an environment of independence.

The essay is also how admissions officers learn that you are writing at a ready-for-college level, so screwing up the ford execution shows that you either dont know how to write, or dont care enough to do it well. Sarbanes-oxley Governance Paper! The main ways college essay topics go wrong is bad taste, bad judgment, and lack of self-awareness. The main ways college essays fail in their execution have to do with ignoring format, syntax, and genre expectations. Want to read some excellent college essays now that you've seen some examples of flawed one? Take a look through our roundup of college essay examples published by colleges and then get help with brainstorming your perfect college essay topic. Need some guidance on other parts of the ford willard application process? Check out our detailed, step-by-step guide to college applications for advice. Are you considering taking the SAT or ACT again before you submit your application? Read about our famous test prep guides for dimmesdale, hints and strategies for a better score. Want to improve your SAT score by 160 points or your ACT score by 4 points? We've written a guide for each test about the antonia willard top 5 strategies you must be using to have a shot at improving your score.

Download it for free now: Have friends who also need help with test prep? Share this article! Anna scored in the 99th percentile on her SATs in high school, and went on to major in sarbanes-oxley and corporate governance English at Princeton and to get her doctorate in antonia ford willard English Literature at Columbia. She is passionate about dimmesdale and chillingworth, improving student access to higher education.

You should definitely follow us on social media. Antonia Ford! You'll get updates on our latest articles right on Essay Orwell, your feed. Follow us on all 3 of our social networks: Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply! Series: How to Get 800 on Each SAT Section: Series: How to Get to 600 on Each SAT Section: Series: How to ford willard Get 36 on Each ACT Section:

Our hand-selected experts help you in a variety of other topics! Looking for Graduate School Test Prep? Check out our top-rated graduate blogs here: Get the latest articles and test prep tips! PrepScholar 2013-2015.

All rights reserved. SAT is a registered trademark of the dimmesdale and chillingworth College Entrance Examination Board TM . The College Entrance Examination. Board TM does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the antonia ford owner or any content of this site.